We Explode Human Heads

One Small Price of Planting Our Model Democracy

The Ten Commandments which Allah revealed to His Prophet Musa/Moses contained a very specific command:

"You shall not kill"

Despite how clear this command is, the January 2, 2004 Seattle P.I. newspaper contained a front page head line boasting of the American military's advanced ability to kill. Often the word refine is used in the sense of making something more pure but the military uses it to describe on advancement in the art of killing. "Well-trained snipers refine the act of killing" was the headline of the news article. Is it not encouraging to realize that the American military has made killing more refined?

The Article reveals how personal and professional the act of killing has become for the US Army in Iraq.

"Army snipers can see the expression on a man's face when the bullet hits"

One veteran soldier did not seem to mind his full name being publicly used in his personal description of what he saw when he suddenly ended the lives of individual Iraqis. (Nevertheless, I will use only his last name's first letter)

"I shot one guy in the head and his head exploded" said Sergeant Randy D, one of about 40 snipers in the Army's new 3600 soldier Stryker Brigade whose picture was displayed along side his lurid quotes.

"Usually though you just see a dust of cloud pop off their clothes and see a little blood splatter come out the front"

My point is not that these highly capable snipers are guiltier than any person who orders or perform killing by either side during a war or forceful occupation. These highly skilled killers/snipers are only obeying orders from their superiors. But I do find it obnoxious that the US media boasts about our technological ability to destroy the very life that is a precious gift from Allah.

Significantly, these professional killer-soldiers consistently assume that they can distinguish insurgent from a civilian from as far away as half mile. Even from this distance they experience near total accuracy.

Is it not significant that the newspaper would have us deeply appreciate our sophisticated weapons and the skill of our riflemen snipers whish enables them to kill with precision form such a great distance? But these same journalists have no difficulty labeling as terrorists insurgents those who use far less sophisticated methods in order to kill out soldiers. Does using a less sophisticated weapon such as a roadside bombs, make a person or culture guiltier than those who use high technology to kill?

Of course, we classify our killing as totally different from their killing since we classify our hired killers as patriots and we classify the Iraqis as terrorists or insurgents. Also, we see our cause as righteous since we are patriots planting democracy in a poorly ruled land.Conversely, we view their cause as cowardly since they are terrorists resisting our superior democracy planting in their land.

In order to gain perspective on our hypocrisy in the classifications we often make, let us move our selves to a possible future time when the situation could be reversed. Let us suppose that there is a dramatic and massive turning to Shiite Islam by the majority of now mostly atheistic China. Let us also suppose that the multitudes of new Muslims in China from a coalition with the Iranian Muslims and they each have a government which is a relatively Islamic Shiite theocracy.

Thus, the Ayatollah of Iran and his supreme governing council and the Ayatollah of China and his supreme governing council become equally disturbed about eh extreme degeration that has occurred in the US, in Israel and in Saudi Arabia and in the other Gulf States which the US now occupies. Though the nations of Israel and the US still possess nuclear weapons, but to our deep regret, so also do the two nations at China and Iran. But together the combined nations of Iran and China far exceed the combined land mass and total populations of the US, Israel and their occupied territories. Consequently, these combined nations are no military match of the two combined Islamic powers of Iran and China.
But it is not mainly an economic power grab that has motivated the two Islamic nations of China and Iran to overpower the US, Israel and their Arab territories. Rather, these sensitive Muslims have decided that they are being disobedient to Allah for tolerating the evil and wickedness that was spreading from the US and Israel. Among the degenerate practices in these two countries that they could not longer tolerate were the public nudity on the beaches, the consistent sacrificing through abortion of unborn babies on the bloody altars of sexual freedom, the virtual open seduction which often takes place at drunken parties which is euphemistically called erotic dancing, the degenerate influence of the perverted entertainment industry where both heterosexual and homosexual acts are performed all hours of the day and night on TV , and murder of multitudes of young people, which has reached epidemic proportions due to the strong influence America's NRA (National Rifle Association) has in its democratic election process.

Also, due to the dramatic decline in the economy of the US, some of the most highly paid American professional athletes are now allowed to have part of their pay cut observed by choosing to have subsidized concubines and Heffnerranian style harems in order to partially reduce their exorbitant salaries. But perhaps the final straw that breaks the camels back and pushes the Muslims of China and Iran to invade and occupy the US, Israel and the occupied Gulf Nations is this final degenerate phenomenon.

Because the pursuit of pleasure has become such an exalted societal value, very few aged people are put in nursing homes to live out their final days on earth. Thus their busy children will no longer need to interrupt their own pleasures with the interruption of visiting their aging parents. In stead, these unwanted and unappreciated parents are sent to government sponsored happy homes where they are fed specially flavored meals which feature each person's favorite foods. However, after two or three days of these deliciously poisoned diets, the elderly suddenly die and pass on the officially promoted happy beyond.

Being overwhelmed with remorse over these depraved societies virtually murdering the respected elderly, great fear that this rampant depravity will soon spread to their own nations, the two Ayatollah hold a bilateral summit meeting. There in Tehran, Ayatollah Rumzowits of Iran of Iran and Ayatollah Wolfofeld of China make a crucial decision. They together decide that their sensitive consciences and their concern for the future of the world compelthen to obey and exceedingly high calling from Allah.

They decide that it is obvious that by Allah's will they will be victorious in a was with their opponents due to their combined much greater land mass and their vastly greater combined populations and due to the higher standards of morality which they represent. Yes they realize that both of their main opponents, Israel and the US possess nuclear weapons. But both of their own greater nations also possess a considerable number of nuclear weapons. Therefore, if a nuclear threat were made by Iran and China, both the US and Israel would be forced to surrender due to their own congested nations not being able to absorb a nuclear hit the way that both Iran and China would to and the fact that their opponents represent a degenerate morality. They also are aware that if a conventional war were to be fought, it would also be no contest due to their conventional weapons being close to equal to those of the US and Israel. Therefore, their combined population, their higher morality and their land mass superiority more than compensate for any Iran/China weapons deficit.

Thus, their joint decision is made. Ayatollah Rumzowits and Ayatollah Wolfofield jointly agree that they are being uniquely chosen by Allah to simultaneously save their two degenerate societies of Israel and the US along with their occupied territories as well as to advance the cause of Shiite Islam.

Therefore, in order to preserve the precious life that would be wasted in a conventional war they will be involved in diplomacy at the UN and explain their united perspectives to the UN and to Israel and the US.

They explain that due to the US and Israel's threat to the world because of their obvious possession of WMD (weapons of mass destruction), the small coalition of Shiite China and Shiite Iran have no other alternatives but to drop nuclear weapons on the major cities of the US and Israel unless they submit to China and Iran's conditions and surrender within 72 hours. Of course, if they choose not to surrender and rather decide to drop nuclear weapons on Iran and China's major cities, both Israel and the US will be virtually annihilated.

After two days of deliberations by the US Administration, the Congress and Pentagon, the US agrees to the two Ayatollahs' terms. As expected, Israel immediately agrees to follow the US in its surrender.

As an integral part of the terms of surrender, both nations as well as their occupied Gulf territories agree to lead their respective nations in the adjustment to becoming a Shiite Islamic nation under the leadership of an Iranian appointed Ayatollah directing a substantial Chinese and Iranian armed occupation force. This transition period to Islamic Shiite will enable these conquered and occupied nations an ideal opportunity to rid themselves of their wickedness and rebellion against Allah. It will also help their entire societies to realize that they has been subconsciously wanting their societies to abandon their former self interests dominated democratic form of governments and to change over to more orderly Islamic theocracies.

Of course, there had been significant numbers of Gulf Arabs, Israelis and Americans who had rejected the rampant, wicked degeneration which had precipitated the Shiite Islamic occupation so we will assume that there will be a significant percentage who will strongly resist the uninvited occupiers. They will feel compelled to restore more pure way of life that had existed in their nations before the horrible degeneration had become a landslide which had swept aside all acceptable standards of human decency. Consequently, assume that you are one of the many who decide to commit yourself along with many of your friends, to resist the occupation. Consequently, you and others like you devise way to try to drive your uninvited occupiers out of your land by killing as many of them as possible. In fact, you will harass them in any way that you can including shooting down their crowded helicopters. You adopt this particular tactic so that you can kill a whole group of your hated occupiers in one heroic and dangerous act. But, now comes a crucial question.

When you and others resist the hated occupation using these lethal tactics, should you be considered terrorist insurgents or would it be more appropriate to think of you as patriots.

But if you should be considered patriots, why are Iraqis and others who resist Iraq's occupation consistently labeled as terrorist insurgents? Why are the Muslim persons whose heads American soldiers are trained to explode, always considered as terrorist insurgents and not as patriots? They are consistently characterized by the American media as degenerate Islamic terrorists who deserve to have their heads exploded by their superior American liberators.

When a sovereign nation such as Iraq or people such as Palestinians, are occupied, it appears there is one main activity which can legitimately label persons or groups resisting occupation as terrorists instead of patriots. When a nation, group or an individual deliberately targets children and other civilians, they cross a line and become terrorists before Allah and man. But, when the people of Iraq and the West Bank and Gaza resist occupation without targeting civilians, or hospitals or clearly mark Red Cross and Red Crescent vehicles, it is much more reasonable and consistent to consider them as patriots rather than as terrorists, conversely, if the occupiers target children and civilians, weather they be Israel and/or US, they can legitimately be considered as terrorists by both man and Allah.

Leaving our considerations regarding occupations, can there be serious doubt about the American dependence and emphasis on violence and bloodshed to solve international disagreements, is exceptionally wrong and breeds serious negative consequences? Only one of the additional negative consequences is that violence and bloodshed as main methods to solve international disagreements rather than diplomacy and other non violent approaches has subtly provided a model of violence for many segments of US society to copy.

For example, on the same day that I read on the front page of the Seattle PI about a desensitized expert army sniper successfully exploding an insurgents/patriot's head, I read on the front page of the sports section another article about probably violence.

But this probable violence was characterized by the star football player who was involved, as consensual sex. Yet the woman reported it to authorities, not as consensual sex, but as a sexual assault which is usually a police term which means rape.

Significantly, the similarity in the point of view of that celebrity star football player describing his sexual encounter with a female acquaintance as consensual sex with the woman described it as a sexual assault or in other words, rape.

Significantly, the similarity in the point of view of that start athlete who is constantly showered with messages of self importance, with another even greater celebrity athlete who is consistently showered with even more messaged of self importance, is amazing. Both were accused by women who were 100% dear in their accusations that they had been raped or sexually assaulted which are acts of violence. But both women insisted that the women had consented to participate in a sexual act.

It is significant to note that sexual intercourse is consistently considered to meet the personal needs of the man and not of the woman unless the sexual relationship is participated in by the woman in a context of consensual personal intimacy. But if there were this context of caring intimacy, it would usually indicate that the woman would not accuse the man of the criminally punishable crime of rape.

The point I am making is this. Violence permeates the foreign policy decided upon by seemingly non violent men who arrange for other younger, impressionable young man to be desensitized so that they will not blink when they cause a head to explode r to cause blood to splatter out from a victim's body. But this culture of violence which is vacillated by men wearing ties at the white house and/or dressed in neat uniforms at the Pentagon, has a horrible effect on the lives of the young men who were subject to serious desensitization before they could be transformed into effective killers. And it would be truly extraordinary young man who could make the transition from a hired, expert killer to a sensitive husband and a caring father when he leaves hired killing responsibilities. Additionally, I submit that there is definitely a psychological link between the self important government which feels it has the right to used the sniper's bullet in order to impose the political philosophy of democracy on reluctant customers, with the self important celebrating athlete or any self important physically stronger male who refuses to believe that no means no when it comes to permission to have a n sexual encounter with a physically weaker member of the opposite sex. In the case of the exalted successful athlete, he subconsciously reasons that it should be a privilege for an ordinary woman to have a sexual relationship with someone who distortedly perceives himself as exceptionally important. Similarly, it is different for the self important US to consider that it is doing anything wrong when it kills others for refusing its favor of imposing democracy through the barrel of a gun which has a highly developed technologically superior gun sight. For the enemy should appreciate and be thankful for both the superior democracy and the advanced technology that the highly technological gun sight represented when it enables a sniper to successfully explode a human head from a considerable distance.

How strongly US arrogance and violence in international affairs inspire violence throughout American society including violence toward vulnerable women is difficult to measure. However, the government's successful modeling of the concept that "might makes right" has obviously had a tremendously negative impact on our society. But, according to both the now Risen Messiah and the ancient Prophet Hezekiel/Ezekiel, the whole US society will be the final victim of America's addiction to living by violence.

Out Messiah proclaimed:

"Those who live by weapons will die by weapons."

Significantly, Allah has emphatically proclaimed a parallel truth through His Prophet Hezekiel: "Since you have not hated bloodshed, bloodshed will pursue you." Ezekiel 35:6

To ignore these two profound truths is for a nation to slowly but certainly commit suicide. Therefore, is it not significant that the US far exceeds every other nation is the number of young people who are killing each other with guns? Thus, with the violence that over entertainment industry brainwashing us with, and the message that over government is constantly teaching us, young people have little chance to escape violence. For the message of the US government screams to all US citizens is: "killing is okay as long as you are able to deceive yourself into thinking that you are in the right when you kill."

Of course, you may spend time in prison for your murder of someone, but that message has not been as strong as is the subtle but consistent American message that violence is okay. Otherwise, why would many more American women be victims of violence on Super Bowl Sunday than any other day of the year? Yes, the day that is the year's great sports day for the majority of US sport's fans is the same day that precious human being whom Allah has destined to the living springs of new life for hi s infants coming into this work becomes a day of dread. For on that day of the ultimate football contest for American men becomes the main day that there male sport fans physically and psychologically abuse their wives and the mothers and future mothers of their children.

Yes, if the US is not a culture which even brainwashes its future mothers that killing is even a desirable experience for young women, why did my own shocked eyes view the following event at a US Navy women's training facility for young woman entering the Navy. As shown on public television these young women were proudly marching together with their rifles on their shoulders shortly before their graduation ceremony. As they marched, they chanted together in unison:

"We want to go to Iran. We want to kill an Iranian. We want to go to Iran. We want to kill an Iranian. We want to go to Iran. We want to kill…."

What is mystifying is this. It is the President of the US who arrogantly announced to the American people that it is the people of Iran who are one of the great sources of evil in our world. Yet, when have Iranians killed Americans in order to justify American military leaders openly brainwashing impressionable young women so that they will sing together about one of their main goals in life being to go to Iran in order to kill Iranians.

This US preoccupation with killing Iranians is obviously connected to out superficial, arrogant President openly lecturing the world that the Americans are the good guys and the Iranians are the bad guys. So even if George W. Bush might disagree, Allah must perceive that the US government generates much more hate and desire to kill Iranians than the Iranian government generates similar feelings toward the US.

Yes, we in America, have cultivates a "kill" culture. But we hide out sophisticated "kill culture" behind a clever smoke screen. We unfold our over worked trigger fingers and point these trigger fingers at other cultures. As we point out guilty fingers at the other cultures, we accusingly ask, "Why do you kill?"

But Allah sees through our smoke screen and reminds us of the penetrating proclamation of His Prophet Ezekiel / Hezekiel.

"Since you have not hate bloodshed, bloodshed will pursue you".

The US is pursuing bloodshed and bloodshed is pursuing the US.