Fed – Upism

Finally Enough Death Unites People U.N. Swallows Fat U.S. Camel

Two thousand years ago the true Messianic Man (not the Bush man and his Neoconservative followers who pretend that Bush is ALLAH’s man who will bring peace to the world), often had a discouraging experience when observing Jewish religious leaders. But there was one area in which he found them to be quite competent. They could always divert their own attention and other people’s attention away from an important major problem. That is, they could always shift the focus to a problem that had much less significance than the real problem. (Significantly, this is quite similar to how Cheney, Bush and Wolfowitz switched the problem from Al Qaeda and the Taliban in Afghanistan to Saddam Hussein and Weapons of Mass Destruction and to Saddam Hussein plus Democracy in Iraq.) Especially were they able to shift the focus when they themselves had a moral and religious duty to be the ones to deal with the major problem. So these supposed leaders always made certain that major issues to ALLAH which concerned truth, mercy and justice, were always avoided.

In order to focus attention on this gross avoidance of moral responsibility the Messiah invented a concise humorously sounding metaphor that summarized this exceptionally serious disobedience to ALLAH’s Will. He labeled their immoral practice as “straining out gnats while swallowing camels.” In order to drive home his point about their extreme disobedience to GOD, he forced them to face the absolute ridiculousness of a person worrying constantly about keeping the tiniest harmless flying insect out of his mouth (a gnat), but not even noticing if they were accomplishing the totally impossible by swallowing a camel. So while giving great attention to the tiny gnats, they themselves and even others were not noticing that half of a camel is already in their mouth making its way through their throat to their stomach. So his stinging words to the religious leaders were: “You blind guides. You strain out a gnat but you swallow a camel.”

This deliberate camel swallowing is my introduction to the present hypocrisy and denial now flagrantly occurring in the world’s main institution for governing; the United Nations. The current rape of Iraq which I have previously compared to the Japanese barbaric rape of Nanjing China, is constantly on my mind. But it was not until I read a lead editorial in the June 24, 25 International Herald Tribune regarding the U.N.’s new council of human rights, that I was reminded of our Messiah’s words regarding the ancient art of camel swallowing. So even the Herald Tribune’s sponsor, the New York Times had entered the fierce competition to become the “World Champion Camel Swallower.”

On the surface the editorial appeared to have honorable intentions. Its contents were encouraging the genuinely noble cause of human rights by praising a new human rights council sponsored by the U.N. But the article also praised the role of the Bush Administration in holding out for “high principle” when rules for membership in this important human rights committee were being reviewed.

In my shocked mind, for the editorialist to praise the degenerate Bush Administration for its commendable work promoting human rights at the very time it is flagrantly raping the innocent people of the sovereign nation of Iraq, has a crude equivalent. It is like praising a murderous serial rapist of pre-teen girls for using a condom in the infrequent times he decides not to murder his brutalized rape victims.

How can the world community represented at the U.N. tolerate the rape of Iraq that is occurring in front of the world’s T.V. cameras and newspapers in the name of promoting Democracy? Instead of toleration, all of us should be busting our posteriors (rear ends) to bring a swift halt to this horrible public massacre of an innocent nation. Shockingly, instead the gullible U.N. is willing to accept the ridiculous pretense of the U.S. that it is nobly protecting the interests of the world’s free people.  (By the time this paper is prepared for my web site, you can add Lebanon to Iraq, for nations the U.N. does not even complain about the U.S. or Israel raping.)

For the editorial to make an exaggerated negative issue about allowing the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to participate on the Human Rights Council when that nation flagrantly disregards the rights of Saudi women, makes a travesty of logic. There is no reasonable comparison between this alleged human rights abuse of Saudi women and the horrible crime occurring against the innocent Iraqi people and recently committed against the Lebanese people.

Yes! It is very discouraging and unfair for women in Saudi Arabia to have so many less rights that they deserve. But it is not being recognized that the current government in Saudi Arabia is belatedly acknowledging that this denial of rights is wrong. Additionally, the leaders are taking slow but deliberate steps to change this regrettable circumstance.

In sorry contrast to the belated steps the Saudi leadership is taking, the rape of Iraq is continuing full steam ahead.

Further compounding the Iraqi tragedy, the twisted persons who hold the power in the U.S., continue to spin the chaos they are creating in Iraq as a remarkable triumph for democracy and freedom in the Middle East.

A case can be made that the level of evil that is presently occurring in Iraq because of the U.S., compared with the lack of human rights in Saudi Arabia, is similar to the following brief comparison.

It is like a gathering of U.N. human rights council members looking into a small fish tank and agreeing that one particular gold fish is far too aggressive. But while they are seriously addressing what they consider to be a grave human rights issue created by one aggressive goldfish, they hear terrifying screams from the victims of another horrible disturbance. But they each desperately try to ignore the screams from the other disturbance and to concentrate on what they consider to be the travesty of justice in the fish tank.

But in reality, the nation of one of their own absent human rights council members is now involved in what some describe as a temporary diversion. But the blood, the cries and the screams of the victims are all very real as innocents dreadfully suffer while attempting to protect themselves from the type of stability being forced upon them by a highly weaponized and aggressive nation. Regretfully, the agonized screams grow in intensity as multiple innocent victims, some quite mutilated, continue to attempt to protect themselves from the supposed stable democracy that the nation which has led the Human Rights Council in the past, is now trying to violently force on an innocent but often resistant people. Their highly diverse people are being ordered to quickly adust to this foreign type of representative democracy.  Worse yet, the transition to peaceful democracy is being facilitated with highly weaponized soldiers, with bombers, with helicopters with torture and with bullets.  The peaceful transition is demanding more permanent fortress like U.S. military bases throughout the sovereign, innocent nation.  Also, a giant, new fortresses like U.S. Embassy complex is being built containing (23) twenty three buildings which absorb 416 dunams (104 acres) of the scarce land of the sovereign nation’s capital.  Even torture and secret prisons are considered justified in order to smoothly usher in this peaceful, representative democracy.

Those sovereign citizens of the sovereign nation who were formerly members of the ruling class, during this chaotic period which was once predicted to be a period of smooth transition to representative democracy, are routinely tortured, mutilated and murdered.  They are tortured, mutilated and murdered even in groups by those being trained to replace the old, allegedly corrupt leadership.  Of course the murdered groups often include some who are stubbornly resistant to the foreign imposed democracy, so that the presence of these alleged resisters to the healing medicine of democracy provides a supposed justification for their horrendous murders.  That is the price that must be paid by the Iraqi citizen for being unwilling to fully cooperate with the promised smooth transition to representative democracy.  For those of the former ruling class who were still murdered even though they were cooperating, their horrible deaths were the result of a somewhat different price.

Those murdered innocent cooperators paid the horrible price of belonging to the wrong branch of the main religion.  This would have been avoided if certain intellectual civilians in the U.S. had not decided to heal that nation’s problems by forcing on it majority democracy and a premature march to the polls so that the U.S. government would have something to boast about quite quickly.

Shamefully, there are Human Rights Council members who are highly indignant that there are obstructionist and defeatist types who do not accept the fact that all the chaos, murder and suffering in Iraq is truly in the best interest of both the Iraqi people and all the American people, as well as all the people of the world.  They reason that it is totally defensible that the kind of Arab Muslim Iraqi people who participated in 9/11 had to be taught a painful lesson by the American people who truly understand what human  rights and representative government is all about.  (It is irrelevant to most Americans as well as to Dick Cheney, that there were no Iraqis that were even remotely connected to 9/11.)

They are even more indignant that the considerable noise from this necessary, constructive modification of the political environment of this one mostly Muslim mid Eastern nation, would be allowed to interfere with the important work of the human rights council.

Excuse me for being terribly confused.  What moral high ground can the U.S. possibly be claiming to be standing upon regarding the noble issue of human rights when it is itself involved up to its ears in the ugliness of what it has chosen to initiate in the sovereign nation of Iraq?  In light of all this ugliness, the U.S. still has the shamelessness to claim that it possesses the moral superiority to unilaterally choose to bring chaotic bloodshed to an innocent Middle Eastern, predominantly Muslim nation and simultaneously should still be able to have the last authoritative word on human rights issues at the U.N.

Significantly, it was only one unique man out of all the civilian citizens of the entire U.S., who virtually single handedly was able to persuade a majority of his fellow citizens that our nation was in mortal danger from Iraq.  He was probably the only person out of our entire democracy who had the unique ability to accomplish such a challenging task while primarily using only one corner of his mouth. Despite this handicap, he was able to plant in the American public’s mind distorted and twisted, but strategic misinformation.  Significantly, Dick Cheney was the main point man who succeeded in convincing a majority of the U.S. public that it was too great a risk not to invade the innocent, sovereign nation of Iraq.  He insisted that the intelligence information indicated that Al Qaeda operatives had possible links with agents of Saddam Hussein’s government which at least could possibly indirectly link them with the 9/11 perpetrators.

Therefore, in the publics mind, in order to prevent another 9/11 or even worse, a Condoleeza Rice “mushroom cloud,” the innocent, sovereign people of Iraq had to be invaded as soon as possible which also turned out to mean brutalized, occupied, imprisoned, abused and tortured as soon as possible and as effectively as possible. 

So all of this horrendous suffering of this innocent sovereign Iraqi people is to more or less guarantee that no harm would come to the innocent Bush regime or to the innocent citizens of the U.S. (But instead Iraq has multiplied the number of people who hate what they observe that the U.S. stands for, with some of these new haters, not being Muslim.)

So now the entire U.N. stands quietly by and allows the U.S. to be praised for advancing the noble cause of human rights while before the eyes of the entire world, this nation publicly and grossly violates the human rights of the sovereign nation of Iraq.  But we say that this is justified in order to bring Iraqis democratization to prevent this people who have never made an aggressive move toward the U.S., from bringing harm to the U.S.

Scandalously, intellectuals like the self identified democratic realist (an off-shoot of neoconservatism) justifies this democratization by brutalization on the assumption that since there must have been Arab Islamic Radicals (AIR) living secretly in Iraq. Consequently, the whole nation deserved to be preemptively invaded in order to democratize it to protect America’s strategic interests.  This is all justified under his ideological category of strategic necessity.

In his essay, “In Defense of Democratic Realism” which responds to criticism from Francis Fukuyama, the respected Neoconservative intellectual, Charles Krouthammer, proclaims:  “We will support democracy everywhere, but we will commit blood and treasure only in places where there is strategic necessity” (which he helpfully identifies as) “meaning places central to the larger war against the existential enemy, the enemy that poses a global mortal threat to freedom.”

This is how this ideological, and quite influential intellectual categorizes the innocent people of Iraq.  Thus, he justifies the horrible bloodshed there by labeling these people who had never threatened the people of the U.S. as “a global mortal threat to freedom.”

But he does not come up with this label without developing a rationale that plants virtual hysterical panic in the minds and hearts of the American people, quite similar to that planted by the calm, scholarly Condoleeza Rice in the shocked minds of the American public.  As justification for the war in Iraq, she suggested that once we saw the “mushroom cloud,” it would be too late.

Similarly, Mr. K deftly links the potential great harm and devastation to cities of the U.S. with the “democratization of technology” that puts the possibility of nuclear devices in the hands of terrorist types who could detonate homemade nuclear mobile devices in American cities. 

While I can acknowledge that there is a slight trace of reasonableness to this rationale, I find that Mr. K quietly sneaks in a Kirkegardian “leap of faith” about which I have serious reservations. 

How can he possibly think that massive panic and destruction in key American cities, can be substantially prevented by our “Three Stooges” approach to bringing democracy to Iraq through bombs, bullets, suffering and death?

Mr. Krauthammer states:

“Radical Islam’s obvious intent is to decapitate the American polity, cripple its economy, and create general devastation.  We have seen what a mere 19 Islamists can do in the absence of WMD.  We have seen what but two envelopes of mail delivered anthrax can do to the world’s most powerful capital.  Imagine what a dozen innocuous vans in a dozen American cities dispersing aerosolized anthrax could do.  Imagine what just a handful of the world’s loose nukes, detonated simultaneously in New York, Washington, Chicago, and a few other cities would do to the United States.  America would still exist on the map.  But what kind of country—what kind of polity—would be left?  If that is not an existential threat, nothing is.”

So with those potential horrific scenarios firmly planted in our panicked minds, Krouthammer debates the “End of History” man, Francis Fukuyama on why it is specifically Iraq that poses an existential threat to the vulnerable U.S.  Furthermore, he somehow links our using our military might­ to democratize the people of Iraq as mysteriously preventing the likelihood of the type of horrendous scenarios that he envisions from occurring in America, when just the opposite is actually happening as U.S. intelligence reports confirm.

He implies if not suggests that the majority of the potential chaotic destruction which could occur in the U.S. would for some unsupported reason be due to the ubiquitous AIR (Arab Islamic Radical) persons who hide in Iraq.  Because of his implication that Iraq is where these future destroyers of American cities will choose to hide and that it is Iraqi agents with whom they will choose to talk, that his strange line of reasoning justifies Iraq being the reasonable target for bombs, bullets death and democratization. So that supposedly air tight argument is sufficient justification for Iraq being the obvious moral choice for us to bomb and to wage destructive war against and to brutally occupy in order for us to enforce democratization. Then this coerced democratization will somehow prevent the destruction to American cities which he has hypothesized, may conceivably occur.

However, if it is mainly the potential of alleged AIR people who are in Iraq that justifies such a chaotic mixture of U.S. inflicted military and political chaos in that specific nation, then Detroit, Chicago, Montreal and London must also deserve at least U.S. military’s bullets, bombs and helicopters minus the political activity, because a strong case can be made that AIR people (Arab Islamic Radicals) also covertly reside in those cities.  So as Mr. K’s horrendous scenarios supposedly qualify a certain city or specific region as posing a “global existential threat,” the AIRs residing in Western cities could certainly more efficiently coordinate the nuclear devastation to the West than those AIRs residing in the far off, much less centrally located city of Baghdad.  And being based in Baghdad, they would obviously have much less access to the necessary technology than do the cities of the West.  So Detroit, Chicago and Montreal should be preparing for an eminent U.S. military attack if Mr. K’s  reasoning is followed.

Please o people of the Middle East, rise up and expose such perverse logic  by influential U.S. based Neoconservative, American foreign policy lobbyists.  The strange minds of these confused U.S. decision influencers manipulate many resources and much raw power.  If it were not for the influence of such powerful Administration propagandists, it is quite possible that Iraq would not have been invaded or that the tragic occupation would not have continued to receive the strong public support that it has. 

So please o writers and thinkers of the Middle East, with your pens, your tongues and your editorials, boldly counter every sick argument of these camel swallowing blood mongers who will search for any conceivable pretense to turn the predominantly Muslim nation of Iraq into another U.S. Middle Eastern out-post.

Please speak up o officials at the U.N.  Publicly, consistently and constantly speak out against U.S. intellectuals and justifiers of the four potentially fascist pillars of the self-serving Bush Doctrine!

This ugly calloused elitism has laid the intellectual foundations for the U.S. assumption that it has the moral right and moral responsibility to bring destruction, chaos, suffering and death to the predominantly Muslim people of Iraq.  Now it is well beyond time that the destruction and massive death that the invasion and occupation of Iraq has brought, be itself brought to an end. Yes, there is a peaceful resource to accomplish this expulsion that can be utilized if there is sufficient motivation on the part of the occupied that they will make the sacrifice of insuring cooperation between diverse religious groups.  If there is overwhelming willingness to cooperate, there is much that can be accomplished.  The combined power of millions of peaceful voices can and will accomplish what roadside bombs and multiple suicide bombers inspired by Zarqawi and Bin Laden types, cannot.

The American military and political dominance in Iraq must encounter an ominous and pervasive storm cloud raining down “fed-up-ism” on all the streets, towns and cities of Iraq.  A down pour of indignation from Shi’a from Kurds from Sunni and from Christians must saturate the American military and political presence in Iraq. Peaceful street demonstrations and united voices throughout Iraqi society must carry the same clear concise message. 

“This forceful message must emanate from Shi’a, from Christians, from Kurds and from Sunnis.  Each individual, indignant voice must be proclaiming this one emphatic message.  Our country belongs to us and it does not belong to foreign occupiers.  Iraq is ours and we are fed-up with being shoved around by the ajaanib (foreigners) trying to violently and forcefully impose their government and their oil interests upon Iraq.”

Marxism and Communism held a negative domination over much of the free world for decades.  As simplistic as it sounds, Fed-up-ism will be an ism that is in vivid contrast to the blatant atheism of both the Jewish generated isms of Communism and Marxism.  Fedupism will instead be a sincere call to ALLAH  from the Arab Muslim and Arab Christian people for His deliverance in Iraq from unwelcome U.S. military and U.S. political dominance.  But fed-up-ism will warmly welcome the presence, participation and comfort of ALLAH’s still living Messiah as revealed in both the Holy Quran and the Injeel.

Soon, one sincere, one emphatic message must dominate the Iraqi sound waves.  We are Fed Up!  A suitable acronym will be uniting for the Iraqi people.  It may indeed be:  “F =  Finally, E = Enough, D = Death, U = Unites, P = People = Fed-Up!  Whether it is Fed-Up or some other word or term, an appropriate word or term is necessary for its unifying influence.  Such unity is necessary in order to sustain the effort needed to expel an unwelcome, militarized occupier.

To the degree that a sustained peaceful movement from hearts remains a legitimate cry for justice and freedom largely determines the degree of its success.  In the case of expelling the heavily militarized destabilizing Americans, it is a sincere cry to ALLAH for justice in the midst of injustice, a cry for freedom in the midst of bondage, in the midst of arrogance, in the midst of presumption, in the midst of militarism, in the midst of dominance, in the midst of religious and culturally insensitive demands, in the midst of bloodshed, in the midst of suffering and death, in the midst of oppression and in the midst of a coercive and violent occupation, that will triumph.  Therefore ALLAH’s still living Messiah man from now occupied West Bank Bethlehem will invisibly be walking with you as you struggle through this suffering, tragedy, chaos and death.  Yes, his presence will be realized, if not emotionally felt by those who cry out for help from ALLAH‘s faithful servant, His only anointed Messiah.

Consistent remembrance of both what he endured as well as his eventual triumph over evil will bring renewed hope when discouragement is overwhelming.  Those committed to peaceful justice will be encouraged when they remember that with ALLAH’s empowerment two thousand years ago, this Messiah triumphed over both death and pervasive injustice in Al Quds/Jerusalem.  So now he again will be empowered by ALLAH to triumph over injustice and bloodshed in Baghdad Iraq and beyond when his peaceful presence is sincerely sought and welcomed.

Admittedly, “Fed-Up-Ism” may sound exceptionally insignificant when compared with history impacting, intellectual sounding “isms” such as Communism and Marxism.  Nevertheless, when you consider how practical and operational fed-up-ism is, because it expresses both the deep legitimate mood of an exploited and oppressed Arab people who have now decided that it is ALLAH and not the U.S. or the U.N. who can be trusted to aid them.  So now all Muslim and Christian Arabs will be emphatically expressing cries from their wounded hearts to ALLAH Himself for His trustworthy Mercy.  Their request is that He will shower them with His Mighty justice and peacefully expel those who seek to exploit and control innocent Iraqis and innocent, exploited Arabs throughout the Middle East.  Yes, these supposed liberators violently kill those Arabs who refuse to conform to the political and economic objectives of their imperialist, arrogant occupiers and who resist them.

When Fed-Up-Ism is viewed from the ugly reality of life in present day occupied Iraq, it is certainly more in touch with the Iraqi citizens existence than the godless based Marxism or killer Communism could ever have been.

As unsophisticated as the suggested acronym of “Finally Enough Death Unites People” may initially appear, it actually does reflect a profound human and political reality.  For it is the deep seemingly irreconcilable historic divisions among Iraqi citizens which were exploited by the cruel, opportunistic Saddam Hussein when he suppressed, persecuted and often murdered thousands of the majority Shi’a Muslim population and the Muslim Kurdish people.  Now these same religious divisions are proving to be major obstacles which are preventing the highly weaponized occupation forces from being able to force representative Western democracy on the diverse people even though the Western occupiers violently use bombs, bullets, body armor and helicopter gun ships.  Obviously, this extreme difficulty of forcing Western representative democracy on the Iraqi people is largely due to the extreme resistance to unity among the diverse Iraqi people.

So, if it is true that:  “Finally Enough Death Unites People, an historic moment may have actually arrived for both the unwelcome foreigners and for Iraqi citizens.  The foreigners will have been expelled from their sovereign nation.  Finally the Iraqis will be free from both Saddam Hussein oppression and American chaos and oppression.  Yes, ALLAH may indeed use the powerful power of a peaceful united people as His own chosen instrument to permanently expel the heavily weaponized American forces from Iraqi land.

But despite this historic opportunity, if the people of Iraq are not sufficiently fed-up with the ugly reality of blood and death everywhere, so that they will willingly bury their differences instead of continually burying their dead, then this window of opportunity for true freedom and self-determination for the Arabs of the Middle East may indeed close.  If this is truly the regretful reality, this means that that the blood and death in the streets, homes and mosques of Iraq will unnecessarily continue.

Is it possible that though death and blood has been the bread and drink of the Iraqi people, their appetites for this tragic suffering has not yet been satisfied?  If this is indeed the case, children will ask their parents:  “Why must all the blood and death continue? When will it stop? When will the bloody foreigners leave our country to us?

So they must be told that the blood and death continues because the very religious adults are not willing to give up their self-interests and pay the high price of unity.  Yes, it will continue until the religious adults change their minds and sincerely seek ALLAH’s help in teaching them that cooperation and unity has a more pleasant taste than death and blood.

It can be explained to the children that the religious adults of Iraq are like the half Arab, half French soccer player who played so wonderfully in all of the games of the Germany World Cup.  But just as victory was in sight, his personal desire for revenge overwhelmed the better way of sacrificing personal goals for important team unity.  Because it is much more likely to be team unity rather than personal selfishness which will pay off in ultimate victory.  So instead of potentially celebrating victory at the end of the championship game with his teammates, this one man to whom ALLAH chose to freely give the gift of superb athleticism, chose to satisfy his own selfish desire for revenge no matter how high the price his team members and his own country, would be forced to pay for his selfishness.  And this all occurred while the eyes of over five billion soccer fans looked on in stunned unbelief.  Yes, the whole world is watching Americans killing and torturing Iraqis and Iraqis killing and torturing other Iraqis because religious and ethnicly diverse Muslim brother Iraqis are unwilling to find common ground so that they can unite and have their nation back for themselves.

Yes, Finally Enough Death Unites People may truly usher in a welcome new dawn for all the Arab people of the Middle East even beyond Iraq.  And this wonderful new dawn will have future benefits for the entire region’s children.  Or, regretfully the Iraqi people may decide that there has not been enough blood, death and suffering to help them comprehend one important truth.  For the future of their children they must learn to unite and cooperate rather than to hate and kill.

Are the people of Iraq fed-up enough to desire ALLAH’s delicious fruit that grows on a tree named “Unity”?  Time will tell if today’s children of Iraq will ever taste that fruit.  But it is ALLAH’s Will that another factor also be considered.  Whether or not the ALMIGHTY ever has an emotion similar to being fed-up, we do not truly know.  Nevertheless, the Scriptures often speak of ALLAH’s patience.  So there exists the strong possibility that the suffering that has been caused, the arrogant use of military superiority to produce blood and death, the hidden agendas of the Bush Administration, its deception of the American people, its deception of the Arab people and its deception of the entire community of nations, is causing ALLAH to say, “Enough!”  The greed for wealth power and oil, are all in the mix of what has slowly drained the vast reservoir of ALLAH’s patience for what the Bush regime has cruelly perpetrated in Iraq.  So ALLAH is seeking people who will cooperate with Him in expelling the invaders.

Since both the previous Scriptures and the Holy Quran repeatedly teach that there are specific times when ALLAH’s patience with a particular people group comes to an end, there is the strong possibility that this is such a time for the U.S in Iraq.  Adding to the likelihood that His patience is nearly exhausted is the discouraging reality that occurred in the last U.S. presidential election.  In that election, the very people who most publicly say that they take the teachings about ALLAH’s abundant mercy most seriously, did something sinful and shocking.  They were primarily the ones whose votes narrowly re-elected George W. Bush whose policies in Iraq had already resulted in so much undeserved suffering and death.  That fact alone must have certainly challenged the patience of ALLAH. As it appears that certain types of American Christians don’t care whether tens of thousands of Iraqis continue to unjustly die.

Also, adding to my own conviction that the pathetic puppets of Carl Rove, Paul Wolfowitz and Dick Cheney, have almost totally drained the deep reservoir of our Lord’s patience for Bush’s evil Middle East Modification Program, was the personal supernatural experience that occurred in our Seattle apartment just weeks before the last ’04 election which I describe in other papers.  That unique communication from God’s Spirit emphasized how this President is not reluctant to “publicly mock” ALLAH’s still living Messiah.  Significantly, this arrogant man has no hesitation to mock our Messiah during this time of the horrible suffering for the people of Iraq.  He ought to know that the Messiah has a close, personal identification with the unjust suffering of these innocent Iraqi people.  Though it was two thousand years ago, he still carries the scars he received from his own unjust torture and cruel execution at the hands of cruel Israeli leaders.

But there still remains an additional urgent factor that is a vital part of the equation which is exhausting ALLAH’s patience.  That is, can ALLAH possibly be pleased with the intense sectarian hostility, hatred, and murderous competition which exists between so many Shi’a and Sunnis in Iraq?  Is not His patience also being exhausted that both Sunni leaders and followers and Shi’a leaders and followers are allowing this disgraceful hatred among brother Muslims to exist?  Is it not also disgraceful that the quite small Christian minority population has women who must pretend to be Muslims in the way they dress so as to avoid extreme persecution?

Can ALLAH possibly be pleased with the small amount of progress being made to bring long term reconciliation and unity?

I am overwhelmingly convinced as one American who for over forty years has been urged by ALLAH to urgently pray for the Arab people of the Middle East, that a unique time has arrived.  It is now the strategic time for all Arab people all over the world to publicly, courageously and assertively arise to support and encourage the innocent victims of American manipulation and exploitation in Iraq.  Effective and persistent efforts must be made to prayerfully and constructively persuade those unwise and often selfish perpetrators of sectarian hostility and violence to learn the Prophet’s ways of reconciliation and unity.  By every conceivable means it must be ALLAH’s Will that both Sunni and Shi’a cooperate and peacefully reconcile and unite.  This action is urgent so that in ALLAH’s anointed timing, all Muslims will be unitedly empowered by Him to permanently expel the U.S. military and political presence from their sovereign nation.