World In Denial Ignores Bush Doctrine Butchery

And amazingly, the Secretary of State, the sometimes wise, Condoleeza Rice has unintendly learned to model some of their mockery of both the Messiah and the innocent people of Iraq. As thousands of Lebanese were wailing over massacred innocent friends, relatives, and acquaintances in Lebanon, she had the arrogance and gall to characterize the totally unjust death and destruction of innocents by the formerly invincible Israeli War Machine as “The Birth Pangs of a new Middle East.” Then, as if she purposely wanted to put a poison dagger into her mockery of a shocked, enraged, suffering Arab people who were deeply grieving with the hundreds of thousands of Lebanese who had just suffered different kinds of terrible, irreplaceable loses, she made a horrible mistake in judgment.

On August 15, as Israel troops and their Air Force had just began to pull back from the horrible death and destruction they had visited upon the innocents of Lebanon, she made an appearance on Israeli T.V. But she should have known that every word she would say and her body language would be seen by virtually every Arab in the entire Middle East. Since I was watching an Arabic language newscast and could not understand what the Arabic translator was saying, the visual image of her pure mockery burned deep into my mind and will probably never leave. In front of Israeli cameras, and hopefully realizing that the Israelis also had suffered the loss of over 150 lives, but much, much less than the suffering innocent Lebanese, she and the Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert stood together for the cameras. But, instead of their faces reflecting any kind of compassion for the suffering people of the Middle East, they were both smiling from ear to ear as though their combined Israeli/American team had just won the “world soccer championship.” And these two, along with President Bush, are the three person’s identified in every Arab mind as the three who most wanted the death and destruction in Lebanon to continue as long as possible. (While the killing and destruction was occurring both Bush and Rice had made repeated public announcements that “Israeli had to defend itself,” implying that massacring hundreds of defenseless civilians was Israel defending itself.) If U.S. President Bush has wanted to mock the Arab people as much as possible so he could maximize their hatred for the U.S., he and his staff certainly did an effective job.

Returning to those who did not mock the Messiah, Dr. Luke tells us about the compassion and weeping of the women who he refers to as “The Daughters of Jerusalem.” Also, the father of two boys, Simon, carried the Messiah’s cross. Even one of the criminals who was being executed at his side had the integrity to rebuke his fellow criminal for insulting the Messiah. Then he himself publicly recognized that a time would be coming when Isa/Jesus would come into his own Kingdom. So the Messiah immediately told him that he would join him in Paradise.

(Significantly, if the U.S. President truly recognized what this dying criminal quickly recognized, that the Messiah will be coming into his own Kingdom, this arrogant President would never have mocked him for fear of the consequences he will receive in the future. And if he had not mocked him, the Holy Spirit would not have twice emphasized to me that he was and is publicly mocking him. So if he was not publicly mocking him, I would not be writing about how much he will come to regret his publicly associating the peace loving Messiah with the blood and death that Paul Wolfowitz, Dick Cheney and George Bush have criminally unleashed on the innocent multitudes in Iraq and now on the hundreds of innocent civilian victims of the Israeli Air Armada in Lebanon.)

On reflection it should not be a surprise to myself or anyone else that President George Bush would not have enough sense to resist mocking ALLAH’s own Anointed Messiah. For he seems to consider himself as so superior to others since he is the exalted President and we are not, that he has developed a mocking pattern of communication. It is sort of a communication by mockery. For instance, the March 31, 2003 Time magazine began a major article about the President with the crude, profane words of “Fu.. Saddam, We’re taking him out!” Appropriately, in order to demonstrate the mockery he has committed against both ALLAH and His still living Messiah, near the bottom of the same page containing the vile quote was a vivid picture of the President with his head bowed, apparently sincerely praying. This public display of humble prayer just does not fit with a President who would interrupt a serious meeting between a woman of the stature and refinement of Condoleeza Rice and three respected U.S. Senators, to make such a crude, vile statement about the man who was still President of a sovereign nation, “Fu.. Saddam…”

Or, for another example of total mockery of common decency, we will examine the many persons of stature that he mocked at the July Group of Eight conference in Russia when he was unaware that the microphone was on. First, he seriously mocked the cultured Prime Minister of the U.K. by the language he used (sh.t) and the condescending way he addressed him and the way he was arrogantly dismissive of the Prime Minister’s serious concern about the accelerating death toll in Iraq. (Three mocks in such a short period of time should be some type of record for even a professional mocker such as George Bush.)

Second, in the same sequence, he mocked the refined African, head of the U.N., Kofi Annan, and the U.K., educated President of Syria, the Arab President Assad, all in one sentence, saying that he ought to tell Annan to get on the phone with Assad and tell him “to stop that sh..!”

Personally, I am convinced it was no accident that the microphone was left on. Either it was a disgusted technician who wanted to expose to the world the crudeness and vulgarity of George Bush or it was the ALMIGHTY who made some type of special technical arrangements to again publicly expose this crude man’s consistent pattern of mockery.

But consider for a moment this uncomfortable reality. Suppose an open microphone was following George Bush around from 9 AM to 5 PM each working day without him knowing it. Do you dare imagine the number of world leaders that he repeatedly mocks in one day to the Yes men who surround him. Quite likely he mocks such people as the Pope and the King of Saudi Arabia as well as a host of other Arab leaders such as Mahmoud Abbas. But the Messiah made it abundantly clear that these words never disappear into thin air but are recorded by ALLAH to be dealt with in eternity. And he presented that warning in a very serious context. So this warning should not be disregarded by those who are publicly afflicted with diarrhea of the mouth.

My Visit From the Secret Service

Unexpectedly, only a few weeks after I had completed sending out 1,500 or so “publicly mock” cards, I received an unannounced visit from two quite polite U.S. secret service agents who visited our apartment. But to my great amazement, their visit had no connection with the exceptionally critical cards that I had so recently mailed regarding the crimes against GOD/ALLAH of the Bush Administration worshipping an idol to honor shedding blood. Rather, the visit was about cards that I had specifically mailed to several hundred police stations in the Middle East many months before. The agents did not seem to know about the many, many police stations but only about the card received by the one police station in Marakesh Morroco. Nevertheless, without directly saying so, they seemed to assume that I had mailed at least a few other cards. The contents of the previous cards they were checking on had stressed my sympathy for Arab Muslim and Arab Christian prisoners at Abu Gharib prison. The card was also intended to inform especially Arab Muslims about my website and its address. So this one particular card to Marakesh from this large group of cards from months before is what had directly led to their visit because the card had been received with suspicion by the main police station in Marakesh.

The two agents wanted to know why I was sending such cards to the Mid East, assuming that I must have sent cards to more than one police station. Following the policy that if they don’t ask, don’t tell, I didn’t mention that I had sent well over one thousand cards to main police stations throughout the Middle East, hoping that the information that I shared with the police would eventually be shared with the leaders and attendees of the local mosques. (I had decided that addressing the cards to “Main Police Station – such and such a city and country would more likely result in an actual delivery than addressing the card to the main mosques of a particular city because that would result in too much confusion about which was the main mosque among so many mosques. But the reality was that I had no access to either the exact addresses of either the mosques or the police stations.)

I explained that there were two main reasons that I had been sending cards containing my website to influential Muslims of the Middle East. I hoped that by Middle Eastern Muslims reading the content on the website, that this would eventually lead to a majority of one billion, 500 million Muslims gaining a new, more appropriate understanding of one key verse in the Holy Quran. Then, by gaining that new perspective, they would finally realize that ALLAH’s only Messiah did definitely conquer death and that he also totally defeated the evil plans of the Israeli leaders to end the life of the son of Maryam forever.

I further explained that my second important reason for sending cards with my website address to Middle Eastern Muslims was that in light of our President’s apparent blood thirsty behavior, I wished to try to communicate a significant clarification. Due to the way he publicly claims to believe in and serve Jesus, I feel a responsibility to proclaim that the Jesus that George Bush thinks he serves in the Middle East is not the true Jesus who had walked this earth as a true man of peace and who later defeated death. I don’t remember if I mentioned that President Bush gets Jesus and John Wayne mixed up, but I think that this is what happens. After all, both names start with “J” so it is understandable if this President gets the two confused.

After explaining my perspective to the two agents, I directly asked them if I had a Constitutional Right to attempt to expose our President’s apparent twisted religious beliefs through my mailings and my website. They were both quite emphatic that I had a definite Constitutional right to do this.

What I realize now that I did not realize when I first wrote the two words “publicly mock” or when I involuntarily spoke them aloud while I was still partially asleep, or even after I had the supernatural benefit of ALLAH Himself causing the two key words from my post card to float through the air to my eyes, is this. Though I, myself, was previously overwhelmingly convinced that my President had blatantly crossed a line and was seriously mocking ALLAH’s only anointed Messiah by manipulating our nation to preeminently attack and brutally occupy the innocent, sovereign nation of Iraq, I had not yet grasped the extreme extent to which ALLAH Himself views U.S. President George W. Bush as mocking Him and mocking His standards of morality. I simply had failed to grasp how seriously ALLAH considers it when two or three men with distorted messianic complexes institute bloody policies. They make complicit their own entire nation and even other nations in their immoral attempts to use violence and subversion to restructure the entire Muslim Middle East. They even add to the depraved nature of their monstrous mechanisms of destruction by lubricating their wickedness with the precious blood of innocents as if there is an inexhaustible supply of this sacred blood.

Though I had used the term “publicly mock” in describing the President’s attitude toward the values of the Messiah, to an extent I too had been underestimating the degree of mockery he had already heaped upon ALLAH’s Mighty but Peaceful Messiah. While simultaneously claiming to be closely associated with him, he is the willing implementer of wild, irresponsible policies that continue to cause rivers of innocent blood to spill in the streets and in the homes of an innocent nation. Shamelessly, he immorally and manipulatively hides behind 9/11. He justifies his criminal policies by wickedly proclaiming that a post 9/11 world demands that a responsible U.S. President must use his extensive military power to exercise a broad, sweeping vision that will permanently defeat the evil of what he formerly called “Islamo-Facism,” in Mid-Eastern nations.

He is now careful not to be the one to actually speak of Islam or of Muslims as specifically being the terrorist enemy which must either be destroyed or neutralized by his own wild band of bloody Neoconservative supporters of his policies. But these men, themselves, show only limited reluctance to reveal that restructuring the Middle East, which happens to be mostly Muslim, is the only viable answer to permanently defeating what they label as Islamo-Facism and Islamic terrorism. A recent book revealing the development of Neoconservatism was very helpful in exposing me to its shocking foundational tenets which heavily emphasizes that Islam is the main enemy although many would more likely label a corruption of Islam as being the enemy. Unfortunately, on my recent flight to Jordan I lost my copy of this important book in the JFK, New York airport and do not know how to obtain a copy here in AMMAN and have forgotten its exact name. Fortunately, I did not lose the equally important book, “The Right War?” which presents the main views of  the previously mentioned 22 U.S. conservative thinkers regarding their thoughts on the current war and occupation in Iraq. Several of these all male writers (apparently no women had worthwhile opinions) helped me in gaining insight into the destructive if not catastrophic potential of the “Bush Doctrine.”

Regarding the Neoconservative’s serious intentions for the U.S. to economically and militarily dominate the world, Robert Kagan, who the book extensively quotes, shockingly states:

“America did not change on Sept. 11. It only became more itself… The proof of the transcendent importance of the American experiment would be found not only in the continual perfection of American institutions at home but also the spread of American influence in the world.” (So Mr. Kagan’s view virtually acknowledges that many Neoconservatives have welcomed 9/11 as a Providential opportunity to fulfill U.S. destiny, especially to be able to restructure the predominantly Muslim Middle East for which he sees 9/11 as giving the U.S. the unique opportunity to do. Later we will see that Donald Rumsfeld made a quite similar observation about the unique opportunities provided to the U.S. by 9/11.

The harsh reality is that even previous to 9/11, the soon to be bloody Bush men had decided that in order to create the climate in the Mid. East that would best prevent terrorism from spilling over to the U.S, a bold restructuring of the entire region needed to take place beginning with Iraq.

(Some may object to the graphic terminology that I frequently use, considering it unfair to characterizes someone as supposedly well meaning as George W. Bush and certain of his associates as being bloody. Nevertheless, I have no peace to face my Lord at the Judgment if I do not use the most vivid and appropriate terms possible to help shock us into reality regarding how these amoral, arrogant men are using their grip on overwhelming amounts of both weapons and power, to accomplish their immoral, ideological goals.)

Though I do not ascribe to the theory that these men had a role in manipulating 9/11 to occur, from their viewpoint, there could not have been a more perfect set of circumstances to pave the way for them to implement their long desired grand design for restructuring the Middle East’s Muslim nations.

Before we examine the Bush Doctrine which now guides U.S. Foreign Policy, we will clarify a relevant circumstance. The Bush Doctrine was designed by Neoconservative republican men who consider themselves to be good men because they are patriotic U.S. citizens and are not evil men such as they consider the leaders of the Evil Axis, Iraq, North Korea and Iran, to be.

Significantly, ALLAH’s Messiah once challenged a man when he referred to him as “good.” He pointedly reminded the well meaning young man to be quite careful about how he used the word, “good” when addressing a man because only GOD/ALLAH is truly good. But this President gets easily confused. He thinks that it is not only easy for one person to be truly “good,” but he also vastly underestimates how impossible it is for a powerfully weaponized, prosperous nation to be consistently good. But for this President and his speech writers, words are not meant to convey truth. Rather, words such as good, freedom evil and democracy are used to manipulate and to justify. But to convey real truth? No! Please listen to our bold President who himself has the amoral Carl Rove for his chief advisor and the deceptive Dick Cheney for his Vice President at his January 29, 02, State of the Union Address.

“Some worry that it is somehow undiplomatic or impolite to speak the language of right and wrong. I disagree. Different circumstances require different methods but not different moralities. Moral truth is the same in every culture, in every time, in every place… We are in a conflict between good and evil, and America will call evil by its name.” (If he had been honest, he would have stated “America will call evil by its name except when talking about the evil actions of America.”)

This statement, in its context, implies that those who are not with us are evil and that when America calls evil by its name, America is the nation that is “good.” So in the Four Pillars of the Bush Doctrine for foreign policy, it is the good nation, the U.S., stating the Four Pillars or principals it will abide by in confronting evil. This implies, that though ALLAH’s only Messiah explicitly explained that no one but GOD is good, he just did not yet realize that Carl Rove and Dick Cheney and other good men of the good Bush Administration would be so good. So somehow the good men of the good Bush Administration designed four (4) good pillars for the good Bush doctrine of foreign policy which will accomplish nothing but GOOD as they combat the EVIL residing in especially the Islamic nations.

Though I am neither a good man nor an intelligent man, I am an old man to whom I hope that ALLAH has given at least a small amount of wisdom. Therefore, I believe that it is fair to make the following observation.

I am absolutely certain that there is some really bad evil in this supposedly good Neoconservative propaganda of good men being able to design four good pillars in order to defeat bad will. Therefore, if William Shakespeare were alive today I believe he would summarize the Bush Doctrine’s evil by quoting his own famous line, “Something is rotten in Denmark.” Yes, Mr. Shakespeare, something is also rotten in the Bush Doctrine. I am personally convinced that powerful men who are so convinced of their own moral goodness while pointing their finger at less powerful people’s own moral badness are quite likely to feel justified in using their immense power to do some very evil acts in the process of forcing the supposedly bad people to become good like they themselves are supposedly good.

Therefore, I submit that while the Bush Administration thinks that they are simply following their four foreign policy pillars of how to defeat evil with good, they will themselves be doing much evil that they will be unwilling to either realize or to acknowledge. Though they will steadfastly deny it, in reality American civilian Republican leaders who have gained control of the resources of the powerful American military will self righteously and foolishly use their supposedly good four pillars as bad fascist clubs. Then they will immorally use those fascist clubs to beat Islamic nations until they submit to the will of the supposedly good U.S.

The Will of ALLAH

So the key for all Islamic nations is to determine as accurately as possible what the Will of ALLAH truly is and not what is the will of the powerful civilian leaders of the arrogant U.S. Bush Administration.

As irrelevant as this may at first sound, the man who even now remains alive in the very presence of ALLAH, was once asked by a puzzled group of Jews what they themselves needed to do to be doing the work or will of ALLAH. His brief answer to them was:

“And the work (or will) of ALLAH is this:

to believe in the one He has sent.”

In the context of the dialogue they were having that day near Lake Galilee, he was emphatically telling them that the will of ALLAH was for them to believe in the full authority that he had himself received from ALLAH which had only the day before been stamped with ALLAH’s own official seal of confirmation. ALLAH had confirmed His total approval of His Messiah by publicly empowering him to perform the magnificent miracle of feeding five thousand (5,000) hungry people with only five small loaves of bread and two small fish.

This was only one of the many dramatic ways that GOD demonstrated that His Messiah was indeed, special. It appears to me that the Will of ALLAH for the people of Middle Eastern Islam is this. To first learn how to resist the will of the U.S. that it is trying to impose through its four supposedly good pillars. These pillars may have been intended for good but have now sprouted the seeds of much evil.

Secondly, nothing but eventual good will come out of Islam’s believing the anointed Messiah’s proclamation that it is the Will of ALLAH that all people, including Muslims, believe in the integrity and the authority of the Messiah who ALLAH has sent. But this does not preclude Muslims believing in Mohammad as the Prophet of Islam.

But it does include sincere Muslims realizing that it is the Holy Quran itself which emphasizes the following five amazing realities about ALLAH’s only anointed Messiah, who, while supported by ALLAH’s Ruh Ul Qudas, (Holy Spirit), raised the dead, gave sight to those born bilnd, and healed the lepers, all by the permission of ALLAH. (Al Ma’idah 5:110)

The Quran Emphasizes Five Realities

One: That it is ALLAH’s Messiah who He has ordained to be eminent both in this world and in the Hereafter. (Al-Imran 3:55)

Two: That it is ALLAH’s Messiah, who, when any person of any religion chooses to follow him, enjoys a superior experience than any person of any religion who chooses to disbelieve in him. (Al-Imran 3:55)

Three: That it is ALLAH’s anointed Messiah that He has set forth for all mankind, which of course includes Muslims, to be His sign and His mercy.

Four: That it was His Messiah, who ALLAH, for His own ultimately glorious but profound reasons, according to the Holy Quran, caused him to die. (mutawafik) But then, ALLAH, for His own equally glorious and profound reasons, through His own Might and Wisdom not only raised him from death but raised him up to remain in His Own Glorious Presence. (Al-Imran 3:55 – An Nisa 4:158)

Five: That it is ALLAH’s own Messiah who he has specifically appointed to return with rows and rows of angels to Judge us all. (Al Fajr – 89:22)

Bush’s Fourth Unique Fascist Club

Only weeks after the Bush Doctrine’s first three pillars designed to guarantee stability to especially the mostly Muslim Middle East and thus virtually eliminate any further terrorist threat to the U.S., was added a fourth and hopefully final Bush pillar that turned out to be a Fascist Club with which to specificly beat the Palestinians. But especially does this final pillar need an introduction that ties this pillar into how and why the first three pillars or Fascist Clubs of the Bush Doctrine came into being and why the 4^th pillar or Fascist Club is virtually impossible for Muslim Arabs to tolerate.

It is helpful to know that well before 9/11 while President Clinton was still the U.S. President, certain influential Neoconservative intellectuals, many of them Jewish with strong sentiments in support of Israel, were adamant about the necessity for Regime Change in Iraq. Yet, according to William Kristel and Robert Kagan in their paper, “The Right War for the Right Reasons,” President Clinton as well as his own National Security Advisor, Sandy Berger, both spoke for Regime Change in Iraq previous to 9/11. So the initial major push for Regime Change according to these two authors, began at least two years previous to 9/11 with their own letter to Clinton written in January of 1998, whose signatures also included Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Armatage and Robert Zollack.

Kagan and Krystal reveal that the Clinton advisor, Berger, in a 1998 speech, stated that the Clinton Administratin had conluded that it would be necessary at some point to move Beyond Containment to Regime Change. Kagan and Krystal revealed that it was eleven months earlier in January of 1998 that they themselves with the previously mentioned signatories had written their own letter to President Clinton in favor of Regime Change in Iraq. They made the point in their recent paper included in Rosen’s book, that they had made a similar argument for Regime Change as the Clinton advisor, Berger, later made in his own 1998 speech while occupying the official position of National Security Advisor.

So it is well documented that there was at least some agreement even previous to 9/11 by both influential Democrats and influential Republicans that a Regime Change in Iraq was becoming a virtual necessity. In addition to this already strong desire for an Iraqi regime change there existed in the Arab world a deep resentment toward U.S. bias against Palestinians that played a significant role in bringing about 9/11. So 9/11 became the perfect pretext for the already decided upon Regime change. These two factors help us understand how obnoxious the American emphasis of spin, became to the entire Arab Muslim world. So the strong negative influence of U.S. bias against Palestinians and a bias for Israelis remains just as prevelant today even though Osama bin Laden listed it as only the third factor in his list of resented U.S. crimes against Arabs.

Despite how much of an elaborate smoke screen the Bush Administration erects and how much desert sand they throw in to the air to distract everyone, Regime Change in Iraq was on the table as certain to occur whether or not there was a 9/11 or whether WMDs were found or whether no WMDs were ever found.

Whether U.S. politicians or pro Israeli Americans feel that it is justified or not, there is considerable deep resentment throughout the entire Arab world regarding the extreme favor consistently shown to Israel by the U.S. and the extreme disfavor shown to the ripped off, swindled Palestinains. Therefore, adding insult to injury by not only ignoring the extreme Arab displeasure toward the U.S. unbalanced prejudice against Palestinians and the poison generated by the consistently strong pro-Israel sentiment, Bush’s fourth Fascist Club threw more buckets of toxic sand in the eyes of Arabs. It once again exposed the raw nerve of the resented anti-Palestinian, pro-Israeli stance of the Bush Administration.

George Bush had previously proposed a two state solution to help resolve the Palestinian-Israeli stalemate. But consistent with his negative attitude toward Palestinians, in his pillar four he backed off his earlier proposal and virtual promise by throwing in a major new anti-Palestinian condition. Before the U.S. would further consider a two state solution, his emphatic condition was that Palestinians must cease using all terror tactics against the U.S. supported Israelis before a two state solution would be further negotiated. (Of course this fourth pillar did not begin to deal with the Israeli injustice which consistently provokes Palestinian counter measures which Bush always classifies as terror tactics.

Still, this 4^th pillar may indeed sound quite reasonable to those who view “good verses evil” with the same non discerning analysis as persons like Dick Cheney, George Bush, Ariel Sharon, Benjamin Netanyahu, Pat Robertson, Condoleeza Rice, Jerry Falwell or Franklin Graham. Additionally, we also should realize that both Israel and the U.S. also consistently participate in State terrorism but that State terrorism is often in less shocking and more acceptable forms or it is effectively covered up.

A revealing original letter was in May of this year made public that was written by the U.S. Ambassador to Korea, addressed to U.S. military commanders in South Korea during the Korean War. This previously secret letter ordered U.S. troops to shoot to kill all civilian women and children refugees who were trying to break through U.S. military lines and find sanctuary in South Korea during the height of the Korean War. But such U.S. evil was supposedly justified because it was done by a nation which is recognized by simplistic men such as Bush and Cheney as being only good. So the fourth pillar of demanding that Palestinians cease terror for there to be potential for a two state solution makes sense when you naively define terror with a Cheney/Bush type simplicity of black and white, good verses evil. So the blatant terrorism often practiced by both the U.S. and Israel which is viewed as excusable or kept a secret such as the U.S. Ambassador to South Korea’s letter was covered up for fifty (50) years. (We expose ourselves to a major dose of evil in the way the U.S. justifies lies while conducting a war, when we recall the horrible U.S. evil exposed in the Pentagon papers which were finally brought to light by the courageous Daniel Elsberg and the N.Y. Times. These secret papers were invaluable in turning U.S. public opinion against the Vietnam war and thus ending it by revealing what was actually occurring in Vietnam instead of what we were told was occurring.

In Bush Pillar Four, new conditions were added before a two state proposal could be considered. These added conditions went well beyond rejecting terrorism as a tactic to resist the standard State terrorism practiced by Israel when it uses rockets and attack helicopters made in the U.S. It was only three weeks after Bush had announced his shocking Preemption Pillar at a speech at the West Point military Academy, that the U.S. President on June 24, 2002 issued a statement adding his conditions to his earlier endorsement of a Palestinian state. (And those new conditions became his Fascist Club Four.) He explained that to be sufficiently involved in the fight against terror in order to be eligible to became a state along side Israel, Palestinians must not be compromised by terror. Therefore, Palestinians must democratically elect the kind of leaders of whom the U.S. would approve. They must be democratically elected leaders “who would embark on building entirely new political and economic institutions based on democracy, market economies and action against terrorism.”

It is indeed remarkable that a U.S. President takes himself so seriously while ordering the Palestinian people to democratically elect only the type of person that he would approve of before he would keep the promise that he had previously made. To demonstrate how ridiculous the new Bush condition is, suppose the Palestinians were in a position to order the U.S. to democratically elect only the type of person the Palestinians would approve of to be President of the U.S.

Let’s say that they decided to be very magnimonous and only require one condition. Because many Palestinians are Muslims who are against alcohol, the only requirement would be that the Democratically elected U.S. President could never have had a serious drinking problem. So the Palestinians would have had the power to have prevented George W. Bush from becoming the U.S. President even if they had only required one condition, due to this President’s former serious drinking problem.

But let us now take Bush’s conditions to the ridiculous extreme that he would enjoy. Why doesn’t he just tell the Palestinian people that they have two choices from which they must democratically elect one. The two choices are Franklin Graham or Jeb Bush. Or perhaps they should only have one choice for them to democratically elect. They must democratically elect Paul Bremer to be their leader. He must be their democratic choice because of his recent experience in getting rid of thousands of persons who would have contributed to stability and security in Iraq, instead of insuring the instability and bloody insurgency Iraq is now experiencing. President Bush himself made the unenlightened choice of Bremer to lead the supposedly less enlightened and less democratically experienced Iraqis. If it had not been for Mr. Bremer’s brilliant Western trained mind, no Iraqi leader could have been found to have had the horrible judgment to disband the entire army and entire police force and to fire 15,000 Baathist school teachers in Iraq in order to make certain that there were no remaining institutions of stability in the entire nation. But Mr. Bremer was able to create an abundant supply of enraged resentful, unemployed men with families to feed who he made available to be the foundation of the resentful but effective insurgents. So why doesn’t President Bush demand that the Palestinians democratically elect the experienced Paul Bremer to be their leader?

The U.S. President may dogmatically declare that there is moral certitude where good is good and evil is evil. But when he emphasizes such over simplistic generalizations he exposes his distorted perception that it is the U.S. who is good and that those persons or nations who oppose the values and policies of the U.S. in its war in Iraq or in resisting U.S. plans to democratize the Middle East in order to supposedly prevent terrorism, are evil. So he is once again proclaiming to others that: “If you are not for us, you are against us.” (So he actually demands that other nations be “for” the kind of death and chaos he has created in Iraq.) Emphatically, when he makes such a silly proclamation, he attempts to replace ALLAH’s true Messiah of the world with the inept U.S. being the true Messiah, especially for the Muslim Middle East.

In which speech subsequent to his 2001 State of the Union address I am not certain, but President Bush presumptuously singled out Africa, Latin America and the “entire Islamic World” as being the specific places where his own concept of freedom should apply.