Will Israel's Bloody Path of Assassinations Lead to Barack Obama's Martyrdom?My own answer to the question that the title of this paper asks, is a resounding but exceptionally sad, yes! But I am also 99.9% convinced that my yes will not be the final answer if open minded Muslim leaders will take the one step that I plead with them to take. Thus, if they do take that one step, I am convinced that Barack Obama's life will be saved from an assassin who will have some kind of direct connection with Israel. Before I address how his assassination can be prevented, I will use the KISS principle to demonstrate that the appropriate circumstances are definitely lining up for his attempted assassination by Israel. But I will say up front that I do not welcome the idea of being labeled as anti-Semitic for the things that I will now say. But I would rather present a hypothesis that contains a great deal of truth and possibly contributes to saving a great man's life than I would to avoid my own character assassination due to my bringing some of the same charges against an evil Jewish apparatus as my now Risen Messiah did when he was on this earth and was labeled by the Jewish authorities as being demon possessed, and later was publicly assassinated by them. The KISS PrincipleI believe that it was in U.S graduate business schools where the "KISS Principle" was first invented. It was a simple reminder to business students not to make issues that were basically simple into something complex. So a simple truism was stated to remind each student of the importance of simplicity. The truism was: "Keep it simple, Suzie." or, "Keep it simple, Sam." Then the first letter of each word was used to form the short, easy remembered acronym, "KISS." So the simple reminder of the absolute importance of simplicity is called the "KISS Principle." With this advice as our firm guide line for avoiding complexity, I will now ask a series of basic questions about Israel in order to determine if there is more than about an 80% probability that the nation/state of Israel will attempt the assassination of President Barack Obama during his first or second terms in office. Or course, it is unreasonable to expect each answer to the questions to be 100% correct. But I think about an 80% correct response should give us quite a reasonable expectation of what the future holds for this justice seeking President. So it is my conviction that the answers to these admittedly biased questions will bring out into the open an ominous momentum that no one wants to discuss. But it is absolutely irresponsible not to discuss these probabilities about his attempted assassination because not only is one innocent man's life in jeopardy but the entire future of the predominantly Arab Muslim Middle East hangs in the balance. Likelihood of an Israeli Assassination Check ListQuestion 1: In considering Israel's recent history and past history in even Biblical times, what are the three main methods that the State of Israel resorts to in order to deal with enemies of their state from without or from within? My Answer 1: Method one: Assassination and destruction. Question 2: In Israel's preoccupation with building their nation-state by establishing facts on the ground by colonizing illegally occupied Palestinian land, do the Israeli ultra-nationalists see any other of the world's problems as being nearly as important as expanding the State of Israel? My Answer 2: No other problem in the world comes close in their minds to expanding their nation-state. Question 3: Do these patriots consider nuclear proliferation as being as important as expanding the nation-state of Israel? My Answer 3: No! Nuclear proliferation is not nearly as high a priority to Israel as the Israel; nation-state. Question 4: Is the global financial crisis as important as Israel's expanding their nation-state? My Answer 4: No! The financial stability of the entire world does not begin to compare with the absolute priority that a large percentage of Israelis give to expanding Israeli colonies on occupied Palestinian land. Question 5: Does global climate change which in the near future could cause the disappearance of coastal cities, potential famines in significant regions of the world, leading to the starvation of tens of millions, compare in the focused minds of powerful citizens in Israel with the absolute priority of establishing and expanding colonies on occupied Palestinian Land? My Answer 5: Any and all of Al Gore type disasters that may come as a result of climate change and global warming do not begin to compare with the absolute priority that expanding the current state of Israel on occupied Palestinian land has. Question 6: Does the threat posed by Islamist extremists such Al Qaeda in our vulnerable world begin to have the priority to a large segment of Israeli citizens that expanding their colonies on Palestinian land has? My Answer 6: No! No killing or disasters that could come as a result of Islamist extremists could compare with the importance they give to expanding their nation state on occupied land. Question 7: Are there problems in other nations in the world that could have as great a priority to many influential people in Israel as expanding the nation-state of Israel on occupied Palestinian land? My Answer 7: No problem in any other nation or even to starving, exploited and unemployed Palestinians including Gazans could begin to compare with the expanding of the nation-state of Israel on occupied Palestinian land. Question 8: Are there significant numbers of the sons of the Prophet Abraham who are quite justice oriented and who deeply grieve over the horrible crimes that the expanding state of Israel has callously perpetrated against the exploited and abused Palestinians? My Answer 8: Yes! There definitely are an encouraging number of justice oriented citizens in Israel who are Jewish who deeply grieve over the despicable crimes their brother Israelis have callously perpetrated against their Palestinian cousins. In fact, many of them have publicly lifted up their voices for justice and even oppose the whole concept of an exclusive Jewish nation-state. But these Israeli protesters against illegal Israeli expansion on illegally occupied Palestinian land do not begin to have the political leverage and influence to effectively counter the momentum for gross injustice that prevails in Israel. Question 9: There was a leaked letter written by a Likud leader and minister without portfolio, Yossi Peled, about the bribery and black mail that he urges his colleagues in Likud to use against President Barack Obama by members of the US Congress. Comments about his outline plan were presented by respected Jordanian journalist, Musa Keilani, in a 6/21/09 Jordan Times editorial. So in light of Minister Poled's sinister plan, do you think there are already those in Israel who are seriously considering the assassination of Barack Obama since he has become such an effective and strategic threat to the expansion of the nation-state of Israel? My Answer 9: Given the pattern that Israel has consistently demonstrated throughout its biblical history as well as in its contemporary history of assassinating those who are a threat to its immoral aims or actions, it is absolutely irresponsible thinking for Islam not to realize that assassination plans are already being considered. Therefore, Islam must use every non violent, ethical weapon available to defend Barack Obama against a serious Israeli assassination attempt. Did not the Messiah himself ask of Israel this rhetorical question before he himself was publicly assassinated: "Was there ever a Prophet that your fathers did not kill?" Please read the Holy Quran 4:155, when it is listing the wicked acts of Israel and states "and of their killing the Prophets unjustly " Consider how the courageous late king Hussein of Jordan humiliated the Israeli Mousad when two of their secret agents attempted to secretly assassinate a leader of Hamas in the streets of Amman by squirting a slow working deadly poison into his ears. But when it was discovered what the two Mousad agents had done, Jordanion citizens unitedly overpowered them and held them until there were arrested by the Jordanian authorities. Then the courageous King Hussein contacted the leaders of Israel and demanded that they immediately send to Jordan the antidote for the deadly poison that the Israeli agents had maliciously squirted into Mishaal's ears as he was peacefully walking in Amman. Or consider how so many Jordanians know how the present Defense Minister and former Prime Minister of Israel, Ehud Barack, dressed up as a woman along with other Israeli agents, so they could murder five person's in the sovereign neighboring nation of Lebanon who were considered enemies of the expanding Israeli state. And those who are quite familiar with the continuous assassination tactics of Israel would be hard pressed to name a neighboring sovereign state where Israeli agents have not penetrated that nation in order to assassinate some person within the other nation's borders such as Algeria, Tunisia, Morocco etc., etc. And consider how the cold-blooded murderer of their own Prime Minister Itsak Raben, is considered a cult hero in Israel for assassinating him publicly before the eyes of all Israelis because he was exploring more Justice for the Palestinians which was slightly slowing down the growth of the Israeli nation-state. But instead of this murderer of a peace seeking Prime Minister receiving justified feelings of rage against him for his horrible crime against Israel, he is granted the privilege to have regular conjugal visits from his girl friend so they can continue to enjoy sexual relations together to the extent that he fathered their child while in prison. His murderer was granted this privilege even though the had savagely and publicly assassinated Israel's own Prime Minister before the shocked eyes of Israel's citizens. This assassination occurred as he gave an open air speech and the murderer took advantage of Israel's lax security for their Prime Minister. Question 10: Is it fair to count the countless murders of large groups of Palestinian civilians as group assassinations such as were murdered in the Palestinian village of Deir Yasein or at the Palestinian village where then Captain Ariel Sharon supervised the murders of large numbers of children, women and the elderly who were trapped in their own homes while his soldiers saturated their homes with weapons, fire and grenades to make sure that virtually everyone died horrible violent immediate deaths or simply silently bled to death after the guns and grenade explosions had fallen silent. (This massacre under the supervision of the later Prime Minister of Israel is meticulously documented in the U.N archives.) Or should all the helpless Palestinian refugees who were murdered in cold blood at Sabra and Shatilla refugee camps near Beirut, again under the authority of the later Prime Minister Ariel Sharron, be considered as group assassinations. It was actually a so called Christian militia group who carried out the broad scale massacre of hundreds of defenseless women and children but it was the Israeli military under Sharron who gave the blood thirsty murderers the green light while Israeli tanks were parked not far from the two refugee camps at the time the horrendous murders were occurring in the camps where not one person was allowed to escape. My Answer 10: In my mind these vicious, inexcusable group murders are viewed by our merciful ALLAH as individual assassinations of individual women, babies, children, and the elderly. However, for those who keep statistics on official assassinations, it is probably not helpful to count these group massacres as assassinations. Question 11: Does GOD count such mass killing of civilians as took place in the summer bombing two years ago in Lebanon and the large number of unnecessary killing of civilians in Gaza as assassinations? My Answer 11: Yes, from my perspective ALLAH definitely puts each of those assassinations in red ink in Israel's account which they will be required to make payment for on the Day of Eternal Judgment. Question 12: Do you think it is actually fair or scholarly for you to do such plain talking about all the blood that Israel has shed? Would it not be more helpful to view cold, hard statistics on a chart instead of repeatedly mentioning blood? My Answer 12: Is my approach scholarly? Definitely not. As distasteful as it may sound, ALLAH keeps account of blood, not statistics. He leaves the statistics to the scholars. Though the Bible sometimes speaks in terms of numbers killed, it is the blood shed that breaks the heart of GOD. Think of what ALLAH said to Qabil (Cain) after he had murdered his righteous brother, Habil (Abel). "Listen! Your brother's blood cries out to me from the ground". (Genesis 4:10) Listen to the sobering words from the mouth of GOD's faithful Prophet Ezekiel/Hezekiel to the murderers in ancient Moab in Ezekiel 35:6 about the vengeance that shed blood will take on murderers. "Since you did not hate bloodshed, bloodshed will pursue you". Question 13: Does the present day expanding state of Israel hate bloodshed? My Answer 13: Whether Israel hates bloodshed or not will be an answer that ALLAH will most certainly determine in His way and in His time. But it is certainly not our responsibility to punish Israel because ALLAH has His own unique ways of exacting punishment. And The Scriptures quote GOD on this issue. "Vengeance is mine sayeth the Lord." Question 14: In view of how Israel views absolutely nothing as vaguely comparable with the importance of expanding their nation/state, does it appear that US President Barack Obama's unequivocal message to Israel that it is no longer Israel's agenda that now drives the US. Obama's own heart which is now over flowing with justice. So is this totally new shocking message to Israel causing some Israeli leaders to wet their pants in anxiety? My Answer14: Though I end this question with a tongue in cheek metaphor, my question is exceptionally serious. So my answer is, some anxiety, yes. But wetting underwear anxiety, no. But unpleasantly shocked, and having a whole lot of anger, a feeling of betrayal and much resentment, yes. But many in Israel are exceptionally clever resourceful and amoral. So do I believe that sacrificing the life of a relatively young, very powerful African American who was fathered by a Muslim and quite possibly step fathered by a second Muslim, would be a priority for Israel? Yes! Would Israel simply consider it to be a Machiavellian, expedient choice to honor their nation-state idol by assassinating President Barack Hussein Obama. Of course! I would give at least an 80% probability of the choice to assassinate by some key decision makers in Israel. Question 15: If Israel were to choose to exercise its assassination of the uncooperative Obama option, isn't it obvious that Israel would never again receive support and any more favors from the US? My Answer 15: No! This objection to an Israel assassination scenario by the UN, by the US and by the World community is not at all obvious for two reasons. One reason is that Israel is usually quite clever and professional in covering their own finger prints when they assassinate someone by casting suspicion on someone else just as Syria got the blame for the Hariri assassination. In that savage assassination, only Israel had both the motive and the technical expertise to pull it off. Emphatically Syria had neither the motive nor the advanced technical expertise required for that technical assassination. And the second reason is that such an assassination would not permanently damage Israel even if it was under suspicion because Israel has such a deep reservoir of respect from significant nations. A case in point is the way that the US is always willing to let Israel off the hook. So these nations would also find reasonable excuses to soon give Israel the benefit of the doubt and allow Israel to start over even if many nations thought that Israel was responsible for Obama's assassination. For if Israel could find so many excuses to make the murderer of their own Prime Minister a cult hero, other nations such as the US will certainly find excuses to forgive Israel for their probably unproven complicity in Israel's assassination of a US President. And many will believe he actually betrayed the people of Israel by supposedly interfering in their nation building by slowing down Israel and showing justice to their enemies, the Palestinians so that it was justified murder. And these Palestinians who our President now supports are the same Palestinians who Israel claimed for years that they did not exist. (Israel actually built their nation on the foundation for the crude lie about Palestinian owned land, calling their land in Israeli international propaganda as: "a land without a people." And those very people who did not exist were hundreds of thousands of Palestinian families with homes, orchards and farms, etc) Question 16: What very large Christian denomination has been manipulated and intimidated by Israel to totally turn its back on the New Testament's emphatic, repetitive teaching that the Jews of the Messiah's time were about 99% responsible for manipulating his gruesome, torturous crucifixion? My Answer 16: Many may have doubts about Israel's amazing ability to totally change the reality of historical events, through changing history which greatly upsets President Barack Obama. Changing history obviously upsets him so much because President Ahmedinejad has tried to make the horrible Holocaust to disappear. So let our truth and justice loving President try this modification of documented history on for size. For obvious political advantage, despite hundreds of New Testament and even Old Testament verses to the contrary, the large international Roman Catholic Church has absolved the Jews from any responsibility or complicity in the murder of ALLAH's Messiah, Christianity's Messiah, the Holy Quran's Messiah and the entire world's Messiah. If that political manipulation by the world-wide Jewish community of the world-wide Roman Catholic Church wasn't one of the greatest public relations triumphs to occur in modern history, I would like to see the public relations triumph that could match it. So the bottom line is that Israel is masterful at manipulating truth, and at manipulating inconvenient facts. Yes, admittedly there is one profound verse in the Holy Quran, that when understood superficially initially appears to dogmatically teach that the Messiah was neither killed nor crucified. So it is quite understandable due to the emphatic wording used in the way that it is used, that the way that Muslims will understand this verse in this incorrect way until ALLAH through some means helps Muslims to understand the verses deeper intended meaning. But Muslims, misunderstanding of one verse in their Quran is far different than the Jews convincing the entire world-wide Roman Catholic Church to totally wipe the slate clean on one of the most irresponsible, cruel crimes to ever occur in the history of man. And for the Roman Catholics to pull off that change of history under pressure from Jews, they had to totally bend, alter, modify and ignore the obvious intended teaching of not just one verse from their own Holy Book as Muslims do but to fully ignore the emphatic intended teaching of many whole chapters from the Bible. Congratulations oh Jews! You fully lived up to your reputation for being clever when you manipulated the sophisticated Roman Catholic Church to absolve your guilt before that man made organization. But that did not absolve your guilt before GOD for your direct complicity in wiping away Israel's guilt for His Messiah's scandalous murder. Please, oh Roman Catholic Church, if I have exaggerated the amount of your absolving of the Jews in their responsibility for the cruel murder of their Messiah due to a distortion of information that I may have received, please forgive me. For it is difficult for me to believe that even the Jewish spin artists could have manipulated you to the extent that I have been told that they did. Question 17: According to editorialist Hasan Abu Nimah in the July 1, 09 Jordan Times, he noted that nothing that Arabs do or can do will satisfy Israel except if Arab's totally capitulate to all Israeli demands. The quote from Mr. Nimah states: "Israel never saw Arab concessions as proof of goodwill that should be countered with genuine gestures toward peace, but as signs of Arab weakness or complicity. Hence, every Arab concession was taken by Israel as encouragement to continue its colonization with the goal of destroying all Palestinian and Arab rights." With this gross injustice being the repetitive pattern by Israel for decades, is it not obvious that as Barack Obama takes concrete steps to break that pattern of never responding to Palestinian concessions that Israel is convinced that it is entitled, is the following at all unrealistic? That this spoiled child named Israel who cannot take no for an answer, and has a history of always taking but never giving, will attempt to assassinate the leader who is attempting to break Israel's shameful entitlement pattern, is obvious. My Answer 17: Absolutely. Hasan Abu Nimah has painted a bleak picture revealing the dreadful reality that there is no chance of success in dealing with Israeli demands. And if Barack Obama insists on increasing the pressure on Israel until Israel becomes reasonable, he will finally have to probably capitulate or he will most certainly die pursuing justice. The other vast majority of columnists are in the final analysis committed more to optimism than reality but not Hasan Abu Nimah. He is not afraid to expose reality that is based on an unrelenting rejectionist pattern by Israel. But he refuses to express optimism that is only based on a dreamy commitment to hope but on no tangible actions by Israel that give not one shred of evidence on which to base either optimism or hope or trust. Listen to the words of Jordan's English editorialist summing up Ad-Duster's Rakan Majali's Arabic comments only days after Obama's Cairo speech. "The columnist also wondered what are the chances for Obama to succeed and whether his destiny will be like that of John F. Kennedy's. The Zionist movements in the world and evil powers would not hesitate to assassinate Obama even if his call for peace and understanding is just talk." But since Obama's call for peace and understanding is not just talk, consider how much more likely is the fact that because he means what he says, this will raise the already strong chances of him being assassinated? For the bottom line is, you don't mess with the Zionist steam engine that us going full throttle ahead to build the Zionist nation-state. For that racing steam engine will not tolerate any resistance from a relatively new kid on the block who is African American with a father and probably a step father who were Muslim and who has a middle name of Hussein. A case in point regarding the likelihood of assassination of a person who rocks the boat of the powerful is this insight from a very educated and experienced Jordanian friend. He remembered that John F. Kennedy made this challenging statement on live U.S. T.V. just a few days before he was assassinated in Texas. "My father told me that you can't trust those sons of bitches that run the steel industry." Was it only a coincidence that he was publicly shot in the head a few days after he publically humiliated and challenged the rich and powerful bosses in the powerful steel industry? An amazing coincidence? Probably not! But were the powerful and rich leaders of the steel industry investigated in the assassination investigation? Of course not. They were far too rich, too powerful and too respected to be investigated for having only a potential link with the popular U.S President's assassination. Question 18: Did any of the twenty columnists that I read over a 34 day period in Jordan mostly after Obama's Cairo speech, present one shred of evidence from the past decades of any actions by any Israeli leader that would give an indication of a positive response to Palestinian or Arab efforts toward resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict? Was there any Israeli leader that had given tangible evidence to these journalists that he could be trusted to pursue justice for the Palestinians? Answer 18: Yes, one leader, Itsak Raben, gave some evidence of being trustworthy. But for those efforts he was assassinated. And his assassinator is not only now a folk hero in Israel but is allowed to have sex with his girlfriend in prison. But of these 20 editorialists writing or quoted in the Jordan times, I don't recall one kept promise or positive step taken by an Israeli leader being mentioned by any of the following journalists. J.T. Gwynne Dyer-Syd. Guest writer, J.T. Musa Kelon, J.T. Editorialists, J.T. Jaschka Fischer, J.T. Hasan Abu Nima, J.T. Rami Khouri, J.T. Ramzi Baroud, J.T. John V. Whitbeck, J.T. Michael Jensen, J.T. Jonathan Power, J.T. George S. Hishmeh, Al Rai Salameh Ekour, J.T. Walad N. Sadi, Ad Dustor Rashid Hassan, Ad Dustor Rakan Majali, Ad Dustor Ihrahim Absour, Ad Dustor Ali Safadi, The Star Muna Awwad, Wash Watch James Zogby, Agency France Presse Chales Oniens I will comment that each of these writers were consistently polite and professional. Never did they engage in anything close to character assassination and they were always insightful. Each writer constantly tried to hold out hope. But I also found that several seemed to be quite uncomfortable in confronting the very negative future reality that Arabs are facing when Israelis seem to show no desire to honor Arab needs. Though this is in contrast with Palestinians often sincerely attempting to meet Israel's needs. Question 19: After studying the conclusions of this broad array of journalists and watching Barack Obama's skill and drive for justice, do you believe that he and his mediators will be able to negotiate the two parties to a just two state solution? My Answer 19: Possibly a two state solution without justice. But what will be left over for the Palestinians after the unjust, illegal mostly irreversible land grab, the conditions will not begin to allow any created Palestinian State to resemble a just state! However, a major problem has to be overcome before even an insignificant unjust state can be negotiated. The problem is to keep Barack Obama alive because of the state of Israel's compelling reasons to assassinate him in order to continue the expansion of the rapidly expanding nation-state, with a minimal interference or interruptions. Question 20: Do you think that there is some significant insight missing from the writing of every writer that you previously listed that could make a significant contribution to saving the life of president Obama and also could contribute to the stability of the entire Middle East? My Answer 20: Yes, very definitely. I want to apologize for sounding so presumptuous for stating that I believe that I personally have a key and a necessary perspective that every last writer that contributes to the Jordan Times is missing. Furthermore, I sincerely believe that each diplomat and every leader in the Mid East and every leader and every diplomat in the entire would community tends to leave out of their considerations, this reality. That is, every one is making a key omission that even may cost Obama his life and will also kill any potential for the true solving of the disagreement between Israel and the Palestinians. What I perceive that every one is doing is getting mixed up between religion and reality. The reality is that the great religion of Islam is misinformed in its present interpretation of the one profound verse in the Quran so that Islam's leaders think that it has the right to state dogmatically that the Messiah did not die. Thus, if he did not die, that means that there was on resurrection. So if there was no resurrection, this means that there is no living Messiah whose living presence is in the Middle East today. But also there is the equally disturbing reality that the great religion of Christianity also has few Christians who are attempting to make a difference in the Middle East and who are expecting the living Messiah to make his presence known in the seats of power. So also Christians do not seem to think that ALLAH's now Risen Messiah can influence political decisions and political realities. So it appears that there are very few persons who seem to believe that Christians have a responsibility to plug into the reality of the presence of the ever present Messiah in a way that will impact the entire Middle East. Nor do I sense that Christians sense that they have a responsibility to attempt to take steps to prevent the assassination of Barack Obama by the extremely angry and upset Israelis by even prevailing praying in for his being preserved from the strong possibility of a serious assassination attempt. Questions 21: What is the bottom line for saving the life of the U.S. President from a serious Israeli assassination attempt? My Answer 21: I see the bottom line as this. From my observation, the entire Mid East and in many ways our entire world is missing one main point. We are allowing our preoccupation with the importance of religion to shield us from dealing with reality. No matter what Islam's leaders have to say about whether the Messiah died and rose or what Christianity has to say about both, both religions are equally complicit in missing the main point. That main point is that since there is overwhelming evidence that in space, in time, and in history, that GOD's Messiah did rise from the dead just outside of Jerusalem and as a result he is now spiritually walking in the Middle Eastern streets and visiting offices of the newspapers, the homes, the mosques, and the churches, yet no one cares or notices that GOD's living Christ is spiritually present. We are prevented by our blind eyes and our clogged up minds from sensing his spiritual presence, because our minds are clogged with irrelevant information like a kitchen sink gets clogged with garbage. As a consequence, his living presence among us has a zero impact on the most relevant issues like Obama's potential assassination and the two state solution because we are busy chasing dreams instead of asking the right questions about heavy realistic issues. And one of the heaviest issues that need attention is that President Barack Obama is making significant state building Israeli leaders angry enough to assassinate him because they think that he is significantly interfering with their state building. How is he interfering? He is emphasizing justice and is concentrating on not caving in to Israeli special interests. Therefore, I personally sense that the main major step to prevent this assassination is by throwing the Israelis' off balance by Islam at last acknowledging that Muslims must realize that a correct understanding of An Nisa 4:157,158 is required for Islam to get some needed leverage with Israel. So these verses must be publically announced as being understood in a new way. That is, that it appeared to the Jews that they had successfully ended the Messiah's life forever. But that was only conjecture on their part because ALLAH by His Wisdom and His Might raised him up alive. And as a result of this new modification in their understanding of one verse in the Holy Quran, Israel will receive the message that Muslims fully expect ALLAH's Risen Messiah will now be in their presence helping them in their struggle against U.S. and Israel, for obstructing their Justice. Furthermore, Islam should clearly communicate to Israel that Islam is now responsible for that public, strategic murder. back to "Late 2007 - 2009" page __________________________________________________________ _________________________________________ __________________________ _____________ |