The Bush: His Immoral, Unethical, Self-Serving, Sadistic Comments

The Butcher in the Bush

Five Serious Prayers I sincerely Request Readers To Pray In These Dark Days for Palestinians and All Arabs. (More has been accomplished by Fervent Prayer than we will ever know.)

· Oh Wise ALLAH! Please protect your valuable oil from the Greedy Chains of the oily slick Cheney.

· Oh Omniscient ALLAH! Please protect the sincere Condoleezza Rice from the potential grave consequences of her own naivete.

· Oh Merciful ALLAH! Please rescue the very vulnerable Palestinian and Israeli women and children from the bloody knife of the Israeli Butcher.

· Oh Compassionate ALLAH! Please rescue Colin Powell from howling hungry wolves who seek to devour him while he tries to avoid a conflagration in the Middle East.

· Oh Almighty ALLAH! Please rescue us all from the deadly poisonous thorns of the lethal Bush.

Some may wonder how the subtitle of this essay relates to what I have written. “The Butcher in the Bush” has a double meaning. The first meaning is that President George W. Bush and Prime Minister Ariel Sharon have such a close relationship that it is like Sharon is in the body of Bush. So to speak, they are joined at the breast with one heart beating for both men. But since I am writing as though the man Bush is an actual bush, it fits to have the analogy of Sharon hiding in the Bush, hence, “The Butcher in the Bush.”

            The second meaning of the subtitle is this: Though the president is often thought of as a Texas cowboy for his remarks like “Bring him back dead or alive,” the term “butcher” captures something about the presidents present personality that cowboy does not.

            Many of us have been quite disappointed that there appears to be quite a bit of butcher in George W. Bush. In other words, if a person or a people are not with him as he has told them that they must be, he treats them as a butcher treats a piece of meat, and begins to chop them up with his threats and with his weapons. In fact he even possesses an inclination to chop up documents in addition to human flesh.

For instance, the U.S. Constitution, which also protects the rights of Arab American citizens, is not safe from his propensity for chopping. Neither is the United Nation’s Charter which strongly speaks against unjustified unilateral action against a sovereign nation, which he is willing to do if he does not get his own way. To cause the deaths of many, many people in the Middle East because of his biased perspective and military solution to all problems does not seem to be a big deal to him. Worse yet, he has successfully manipulated many government and media personalities to his dehumanized value of Arabs.   A perceptive American writer, Norman Solomon, captured this phenomenon in the following line in the August 23, Jordan Times.

            “To fend off the threat of peace, determination is necessary.” Regretfully, The Butcher inside of Bush appears to have that determination.

(In order to honor the unique bond of friendship which exists between America and Israel, the abbreviation Amer will often proceed Israel and Israeli which results in AmerIsrael and AmerIsraeli. Also for reasons explained later, President Bush will often be referred to as The Bush.)

Should this Bush make decisions in the Oval Office or only be one Bush among many decorating The White House Lawn?

            What even many Americans do not realize is that the word “bush,” when used in the U.S. has a second significant meaning. Of course, the most familiar meaning is that of a small tree like vegetation. Bushes even grow in the desert. However, the more attractive variety is usually found in the yards of homes or in gardens.

            The more uncommon way that the word bush is used in the U.S. is to describe an action or statement which is the extreme opposite of professional. A bush action is characterized by its immaturity. It always exhibits bad taste and poor judgement. But this informal definition of bush does not appear in most dictionaries.

            The word “bush,” when used in this demeaning way was originally a baseball term to describe the unpleasant and unsportsman like conduct of players who imitate the worst conduct of beginning professionals. These players were thought of as playing among the bushes in the minor leagues or what was often called the “bush leagues.”

A Bush or a Statesman

It may be considered one of the few commendable accomplishments of the current U.S. President that he has successfully managed to be symbolic of both these meanings of the word bush. That is, when George W. makes certain statements, it seems more appropriate to visualize him to be a bush decorating the White House lawn than as a want-to-be statesman who occupies and represents one of the most prestigious offices in the entire world. As if it were the opposite side of the same coin, when this man opens his mouth regarding the Middle East, many of his comments must be considered “bush.” That is, if his comments are not thought to be stupid and immature, the best that can be said about them is that they are superficial, self-serving, in bad taste, quite biased and naïve.

            In honor of American President George W. Bush’s unique ability to symbolically capture both of these meanings of the word, “bush,” this paper is called, “The Bush.” This President will be further honored in this paper by often being referred to by the amazingly fitting title, “The Bush.” This concise title seems all the more appropriate since The Bush’s financial investment in baseball is thought to have been his main springboard into the White House.

Do Not Offend Certain Voters

It would be especially helpful when Israel is involved in the multiple murders of innocent Palestinians, that the U.S. President would not give such high priority to not offending both Jewish voters and a large segment of the U.S. Christian Community, which also fanatically supports Israel.

            In vivid contrast, the only priority he seems to reserve for Palestinians and other Arabs is to be certain to denigrate them. Therefore, it would be appreciated if he would give some priority to using at least a few words which show some understanding of the brutal suffering being faced daily by occupied and abused Palestinians. Nevertheless, when AmerIsrael aggressively used its Killing Machine to invade and crush the relatively defenseless cities of the West Bank, what harsh words did this courageous and supposedly enraged president use to attempt to discourage this savage assault by the AmerIsraelis against the crushed, overwhelmed Palestinians?

“Not Helpful”

            In what was possibly a survival strategy to avoid being labeled anti-Semitic, the U.S. media ridiculously characterized it as “harsh criticism” when their courageous president boldly labeled the illegal and ruthless invasion by the AmerIsraeli Killing Machine of Palestinian cities as, “not helpful.” What the American President did not mention is that it was very helpful for his potential re-election that he not say anything more critical of AmerIsrael than to characterize their murderous suppression as “not helpful.”

            The term “not helpful” would be a term the driver of a car might use to comment about other drivers who begin to honk their horns before the light has changed. To use this term to try to discourage the Israeli “Killing Machine” from brutally invading Palestinian cities is only something the current Bush would think of doing. How fortunate we are to have such a forceful Bush to deal with Israeli terrorists that he would compassionately describe these near massacres as “not helpful.”

“Man of Peace”

There were very few Arabs in the entire Middle East who were not both shocked and enraged when The Bush proclaimed to the entire world that the man who Palestinians consider to be a documented cold blooded murderer, as a “Man of Peace.” This one absurd statement by this naïve president did more to turn the entire Arab Middle East against U.S. policies than billions of dollars spent on U.S. public relations propaganda could ever change.

            To persuade the Arab person on the street to support American policies after The Bush’s ill-advised “Man of Peace” statement would require his getting on his knees on International CNN and sincerely if not tearfully beg the forgiveness of all Palestinians.

            The Bush’s absurd announcement that this hated man is a “Man of Peace” would be similar to President Roosevelt during the Second World War publicly declaring to the world community:

            “My dear friends, there are many negative comments being made about the peaceful friend of all Jews everywhere, Adolph Hitler. As part of a world community seeking to live together peacefully, we must all acknowledge that Hitler is indeed a kind man with altruistic motives. However, he is being unfairly criticized and maliciously misunderstood.

            So please, my dear Jewish friend, no matter what you may falsely think Hitler has done to you or your loved ones, please give sincere consideration to my words. Since you know you can trust me, from now on I want you to think of Hitler as a “Man of Peace.”

“Not Allow Israel to be Crushed”

Another vivid example of George W.’s strange use of language and possible mental disorientation, occurred during or immediately after a prestigious Saudi delegation had visited his Texas ranch. They had visited him in hopes of persuading him that the oppressed Palestinians must receive more justice. During the very time the concerned and sincere Saudi delegation was at the Bush ranch, the television cameras were still bringing before a shocked world the vivid images of the massive crushing of Jenin which the AmerIsraeli Killing Machine had just accomplished.

At that horrible time for the worldwide Palestinian people and with the pleas for justice by the Saudis for the crushed Palestinians still ringing in his ears, The Bush made his bizarre proclamation to the world. Shamelessly, he made no mention of his revulsion at the shocking way Jenin just had been crushed by the mighty War Machine of Israel. Instead, he announced to a stunned world:

            “I want the world to know that I will not allow Israel to be crushed.”

            The most obvious explanation for the president’s strange and inappropriate words is that he became confused and disoriented. That is, this pitiful disoriented man actually thought that all of the inhumane destruction which he was witnessing on TV of the almost total devastation of the West Bank City of Jenin, was instead the crushing of an AmerIsrael city. In his confused mind, it was truly not a Palestinian city that had been brutally crushed. Therefore, he was actually sternly warning the Palestinians to not continue to crush Israeli cities.

If this is not the correct explanation for the Bush’s seemingly crazy statement about preventing Israel from being crushed, perhaps the following explanation is:

Under the stress of being president, and due to the pressure of being in front of the live TV cameras, he put words into his statement, which he did not intend to be in the statement. In other words, the President of the U.S. mis-spoke. Perhaps what The Bush really wanted to say was:

            “I want the world to now that I will no longer allow Israel to crush.”

            That would have been a very appropriate statement under the circumstances, so may we all hope that is what this want-to-be statesman meant to say. With great emotion and sincerity he was assuring the world that he was putting an immediate stop to the Israel’s mercilessly crushing the Palestinians.

If neither of these potentially positive explanations is correct, there is yet a third explanation for his bizarre comment which regretfully is probably more closely related to reality.

He indeed did not mean that he would not allow Israel to be crushed because he knows that the whole world realizes that until the powerful U.S. stops supporting Israel, that nation is in absolutely no danger of being crushed. Rather, his not so subtle message to both potential Jewish voters and to persons who support Palestinians was:

“You, my Jewish voters and other Israeli supporters, as well as all Arab nations and other Palestinian supporters: You must all clearly understand what both myself and my administration stand for: We well always allow, support, enable, and empower AmerIsrael to crush Palestinians on the basis of any pretext which Israel can invent. If that is not clear, please read my lips.

            “We, the United States of America will always, and for any legitimate or illegitimate reason allow Israel to crush the rebellious and ungrateful Palestinians.”

“Please, my fellow Americans, allow me to comment further on how those of us who are morally superior have a God-given responsibility to take whatever steps are necessary to appropriately punish those who are clearly morally inferior. As you may recall, my two good friends, General Alexander Haig and Mayor Rudolph Guiliani have both made helpful public statements thoughtfully pointing out that there is not moral equivalency between the Palestinians and the Israelis. Therefore, it is entirely logical that the Israelis would from time to time sense a strong need to crush Palestinians. Of course, it is all the more logical that this crushing would occur when the Israelis feel that they are defending themselves.”

So people of the press, I hope I have been sufficiently clear on my administration's stand on this unpleasant topic of crushing. To be perfectly honest with you, I find it a rather unpleasant topic to discuss. Also, I can not hide my resentment for those insensitive Palestinians who disturb my peace of mind by causing themselves to be crushed.”

Heavy Handed

We will now consider yet another of this calloused presidents inappropriate and actually sadistic political comments. This occurred when he used extremely mild and strongly biased words to criticize AmerIsrael’s ruthless missile attack on a densely populated civilian apartment complex on 7/23/02. Supposedly, this vicious attack was carried out only to execute one Hamas leader along with murdering his wife, daughter and bodyguard. Regrettably, as we will soon observe, this extrajudicial execution had more sinister motives behind it than the murder of only one man along with his beloved family and trusted bodyguard.

The compassionate and eloquent Bush carefully chose to use the mild term of “heavy handed” to characterize this vicious missile murder. He deliberately chose to use this mild term even though he knew the attack murdered at least 9 children, ages 2 months to 13 years, and that there were at least a total of 15 murdered and no less than 140 injured and maimed, mostly women and children. Significantly, America’s complicity in this calloused multiple murder was obvious since an American made F16 was used to launch the American made one ton missile which was reported to have been designed to cause twice the destruction of an ordinary missile.

(Is it irrelevant that the purchase agreement with the U.S. for the F16 and also for the missile purchase is that they could only be used for defensive purchases? Of course, the glib Israeli propagandists can successfully argue that the two babies murdered could have grown up to become suicide bombers, so the entire operation was for defensive purposes.)

In order not to offend Jewish voters and the peace-loving image of The Bush’s good friend, “The Butcher,” the U.S. President possessed the shamelessness to label this vicious attack as only “heavy handed.” Woe to America!

“Heavy handed” is a term a school principal might use when evaluating a teacher who is being too strict with children in her classroom. To use such a mild term to describe a vicious war crime targeting women and children is to elevate “The Bush” to the top of any scale designed to measure bias, callousness and lack of compassion. Yet, Washington D.C. newspapers, in possibly a sincere attempt to avoid the anti-Semitic charge, inappropriately characterized his use of the term, “heavy handed” as “a rare harsh rebuke by the president against Israel.”

His use of the term heavy handed to describe a crime of this magnitude is similar a Judge sentencing a convicted brutal rapist of little girls, to being beaten twenty times with a duck feather.

Significantly, we now have George W. to thank for providing us with more precision and new insight on how to more appropriately apply the term “heavy handed.” In fact, we many soon hear President Bush make a press announcement similar to the following:

“People of the press, perhaps now is a good time to clarify both to my friends and to my enemies the kind of man the American people have overwhelmingly chosen to lead them through these turbulent times. Even though I have been decisively elected to probably the highest office in the entire world, I am able to admit any mistake I may have made.

I know that this will come as a major surprise to most of you, but in November of 2001, I made a serious omission while I was speaking to the U.N. General Assembly. Yes, I realize that an omission is not as serious as an actual mistake, but anyway I just plain forgot to add an important ten words to a very significant sentence in my speech.

You see, I said the following words to the leaders of the nations who had gathered at the U.N. General Assembly to hear my important comments on fighting terrorism.

“No national aspiration, no remembered wrong, can ever justify the deliberate murder of the innocent.”

But I completely forgot to add an essential qualifying phrase at the end of that very significant sentence that I had sincerely intended to put there. So the sentence should have said:

“No national aspiration, no remembered wrong can ever justify the deliberate murder of the innocent, unless it is righteous Israelis murdering innocent but irrelevant Palestinian women and children.”

“When the unfortunate murder of innocent Palestinians occurs and regretfully it sometimes does, as a courageous president, I will most certainly not hesitate to label such murders as “heavy handed.” But to label such justified murder as wrong, no, I could never force my lips to say something so extreme against our Israeli friends. Wrong is just too strong a word to describe murders committed by the righteous Israeli Nation.”

“In fact, it would be more precise to refer to deaths such as these with the now famous term, “collateral damage” rather than as murders. And when I reluctantly say this, I know that my close friends, General Haig, and Mayor Guiliani, as well as the head of the Israeli Air Force, and Prime Minister Sharon will unitedly agree with my sentiments. However, I am the only one demonstrating my own courageous willingness to stand alone and label the wounding, maiming and murdering of three less than a mere 160 mostly women and children with the strong and clearly condemning two words, “heavy handed.” I just don’t think these other four persons have developed my heightened sensitivity to the sanctity of each and every human life. I believe that my personal strength in that area is due to my own family’s reluctance to resort to violence under any circumstances so that this makes me a unique person who is willing to label even the killing of Palestinians as “heavy handed.”

“But you know, when you reflect on the coordination it took between the Israeli Government and the Israeli Military, to be able to keep the number dead, maimed and wound to only 156 in addition to the one man targeted for assassination, you just have to marvel at the precision of the whole operation. It actually reminds me of the time Israel freed the hostages at Entebbe or when they destroyed the nuclear reactor in Iraq. You know, on second thought, perhaps I was wrong to refer to the Gaza killing operation with such a judgmental term as “Heavy Handed.”

9/11 – Acts of Heavy Handedness

Now, instead of referring to the massacres on 9/11 at the World Trade centers and the Pentagon as savage acts of terrorism, the example of The Bush encourages us to adjust our vocabulary. Because we can always trust him to be even handed and unbiased in his thoughtful proclamations and his careful choice of words, by his own example he would now have us refer to the 9/11 murderous, terrorists acts as acts of “heavy handedness.” Of course, we acknowledge that there were far fewer murdered at the civilian Gaza apartment complex than there were murdered at the Twin Towers and Pentagon and in the third plane which crashed. But there are two major factors which begin to equalize both the viciousness behind the comparative statistics as well as the inhumanity of the horrible crime at Gaza with the horrible 9/11 crimes. The following facts hold true unless a person has the overwhelming arrogance to assume that Palestinian blood shed in the Middle East is less precious to ALLAH than is mostly American blood that is shed in the West.

When you take the number of murdered, maimed, and wounded in the extremely small isolated area of Gaza and compare that number to the entire population of Gaza, you will find the ratio of murdered, maimed and wounded to the small population of Gaza to be overwhelming. This holds true even if you include the total population of the West Bank in your comparison. Then, if you make similar comparisons of murdered, wounded and maimed in New York, the Pentagon, and in the third plane, to the entire population of the 48 contiguous states, the ratio of murdered maimed and wounded is not nearly so overwhelming.

These comparative statistics are in no way mentioned in order to lessen all of the deserved outrage at the horrible 9/11 atrocities. But U.S. 9/11 and Palestinian 7/23 must be compared in order to increase the outrage that the West should have against the complicity of the U.S. in the horrible atrocity the democratically elected and American supported Israeli government committed against mostly women and children living in Gaza on 7/23/02.

The second major factor which also goes far in equalizing the inhumanity of the Israeli terrorist activities and the Al Qaeda terrorist activities is that on 9/11, Al Qaeda did not deliberately target children as their murder victims although they did murder some children. In contrast, on 7.23 in the crowded Gaza apartment complex, children were deliberately targeted for murder.

It deeply saddens me that I find it necessary to compare the atrocities which occurred on these two different tragic dates. But my conscience forces me to do this because the self-proclaimed leader of the free world has labeled an atrocity against Palestinians as only “heavy handed.” In extreme contrast, not only The President, but virtually all of the leaders of the world have searched their vocabularies to describe 9/11 as one of the greatest crimes against humanity that has ever occurred. With this grave assessment, I will not disagree.

But, to have “The Bush” not be severely rebuked by the people and government of the United states as well as the world community for not only devaluing the suffering people of Gaza but for also figuratively and shamefully spitting in their faces, is also a horrible crime of omission. His crime of only using the mild criticism of heavy handed must also not escape recognition or be forgotten. As to how the president’s crime deserves to be punished, that is best left to the ALMIGHTY ALLAH.

To attempt to deny that Ariel Sharon and those under his authority who planned and carried out the sadistic raid did not know that many children would be murdered is absurd. Therefore, it is quite consistent to say that many innocent Palestinian children were targeted for assassination. Although, according to differing news accounts, only nine or eleven children were actually murdered, at least 140 more, mostly women and children were maimed and/or wounded by the AmerIsrael Killing Machine.

All a Mistake

If the cold-blooded sneak attack while innocent women and children were in their beds sleeping, could be made any more heinous, the professional Israeli spin-doctors accomplished it. They did this by their pathetic and shameless attempt to cover up the callousness of their government’s crime.   The AmerIsraeli Government actually possessed the arrogance and heartlessness to arrange for their spin artists to appear on International CNN to explain that the intelligence community did not realize that there would be so many children sleeping in this intensely crowded residential apartment complex. I could not believe my ears as I listened to their statements come out of the TV set. Their denial of responsibility seemed unreal.

Without attempting to be humorous but only to high light the absurdity of their “plea of ignorance” defense, where did these apparently retarded, intelligence people expect these numerous children to be sleeping? Did they think that their mostly unemployed, impoverished parents had arranged for them to take an over night outing to Florida’s Disney World?

If they seriously expect us to believe their ridiculous excuses, we are required to believe that the best-trained intelligence community in the world is no longer an “intelligence” community. Rather, they want us to think it has become a “stupid” community, In fact, in order to convert it to a stupid community, we are to believe that one of its new regulations is to only hire senile agents. (I mean no offense against the innocent senile elderly. Yet, we all know that it would be extremely unlikely for Israel to hire senile persons to serve in its intelligence community.”)

For Israeli Intelligence not to be fully aware that many, many children were sleeping in this targeted residential complex, is far beyond the absurd. It is as though their intelligence apparatus would think that there were not children in an elementary school an hour after they had observed the parents and the school buses all dropping hundreds of children off at the school. How brainwashed and committed to being in denial must people be to believe the absurd lies of the shameless AmerIsraeli propaganda machine!

To his credit, Ariel Sharon himself was honest shortly after the massacre and made no mention of an intelligence “mistake.”   Rather, he expressed the expected obligatory regret that so many women and children had been killed. But, literally bubbling with enthusiasm, he publicly labeled the action that took so many innocent lives and wounded and maimed so many others and caused immense destruction as “a great success.”

Nevertheless, the shameless AmerIsraeli propagandists revealed that they have less ethics than poisonous snakes biting newborn babies sleeping in their cribs. As trapped cowards, they resorted to extreme lies in their futile attempt to cover up the excessive immorality of their government’s purposeful massacre and maiming of children in their supposed attempt to execute only one man.

Unbelievably, a full ten days after the infamous Gaza massacre, a tireless but naked propaganda machine still futilely attempted to lessen the world-wide outrage against a guilty AmerIsrael. But no excuse they presented was even remotely believable.

The following is the headline and first paragraph of a news article in the August 4, 02, Jordan Times from the AFP news agency based in Tel Aviv.

TEL AVIV (AFP) “Israel Admits Error in Bloody Gaza Raid”

“Israel’s army and internal security service, Shin Beth, on Saturday blamed a Gaza air strike that killed 15 people including 9 children and a wanted activist on “gaps” in intelligence , an occupation army spokesman said.”

Of course, the news agency would not have been allowed to continue to operate in Israel if they had printed a more honest headline to the ridiculous article. However, their use of the term, “Admits Error” is a very convenient and misleading way to word it. Rather it should have said, “Israel Shamefully Claims Error in Bloody Gaza Raid.”

Oh Israel! Give us a break! How stupid do you think that the world is to believe that you did not know that there were multitudes of sleeping children crowded into that civilian apartment complex. Rather than shamelessly claiming that you errored, you should instead be thanking ALLAH for your extraordinary luck that you only have the additional blood of 9 or 11 innocent children to add to the gallons of blood that is already dripping from your guilty hands for which you will answer to ALLAH on the terrible Day of Judgement.

For those who may say that I am being inappropriate for putting such an emphasis on blood, my weak words are nothing compared to the actual pools of blood Israel sheds in order to build their democratic, racist, showcase nation. Their conveniently blaming an intelligence error for the bloody results of a carefully planned, intended major crime is a needed reminder of a similar tactic of the United States. Our nation cleverly lied in order to give a green light to Iraq to bring about that nation’s invasion of Kuwait. Thus, it was actually the United States, which manipulated all the suffering of the terrible Gulf War. But we cleverly tricked the entire world community into believing that it was a weakness in our CIA, which caused the U.S. to be caught by surprise by Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait. Yet, the Iraq invasion of Kuwait was what Father Bush and his assistants were praying for. And they were also praying that our envoys could humiliate Iraq and Saddam Hussein enough in the terms of withdrawal that they presented to him, so that Iraq would be humiliated if it withdrew from Kuwait. Then, as a result of the failed negotiations we had our needed pretext to try to destroy Iraq’s army, its infrastructure, and hopefully Saddam himself. But we failed. Consequently, we have come back to the cliché which mothers and fathers teach to their children. “If at first you don’t succeed, try, try, again.”

So, similarly, today the little Bush, like an attacking, enraged elephant, trumpets loudly to a mostly unresponsive world that we must destroy Saddam’s huge but so far unproven stockpile of chemical biological and possibly nuclear weapons of mass destruction before he destroys his neighbors, or Israel, or the United States and/or the world. But minds much more informed and wiser than mine say that Iraq’s exaggerated threat to the world is mostly a very convenient pretext for the U.S. to use in order to gain control of the considerable oil resources of Iraq and to provide a convenient pretext to keep more U.S. weapons and troops in the oil rich gulf area. It seems exceptionally relevant that a recent (July, 02) high level pentagon briefing suggested that the U.S. also seriously consider taking control of all the oil fields of Saudi Arabia. If we were to invade Iraq and take over the oil fields of Saudi Arabia as the briefing suggested, would Oily Slick Cheney be satisfied?

With the hundreds of billions of dollars the U.S. is spending on its Military Industrial Complex, combined with the inflammatory but soft spoken rhetoric of U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney, we might soon hear comments like the following leaked from a combination White House – Pentagon briefing. Actually, the following imaginary Cheney speech might not be too far from the truth since he already complains publicly about all the damage that Saddam can do since Cheney reminds us that he is sitting on top of 10% of the world’s known oil reserves.

“Gentlemen and Miss Rice, I ask you, who is to stand in the way of our unmatched might? Next month we can take over the oil fields of Iraq! The month after that we can control the oil fields of Saudi Arabia! The following month the oil fields of the rest of the Gulf can be ours! Then after a short rest and only if we find it necessary, we can gain control of the oil fields of the rest of the world. Of course, I am not including Russia and the U.K. After all, they are our friends and we do not want the world to believe that we are greedy.”

In addition to attacking Iraq for its oil, and not just to topple Saddam and to destroy his potential weapons of mass destruction, there is another major motivation for our attacking Iraq that the U.S. government is reluctant to openly acknowledge. Aside from its potential weapons of mass destruction, the U.S. wishes to reorder the power balance of the Middle East, so that no nation or no combinations of nations compose a military threat to our strategic ally, AmerIsrael. To rearrange the whole balance of power in the Middle East is a major reason for us putting so much public emphasis on the murder of Saddam Hussein which is politely referred to as a regime change in Iraq and eliminating potential weapons of mass destruction. But to admit our ulterior motives would make us even more unpopular with the Middle Eastern leaders and people. And of course it is best to keep Americans voters as ignorant as possible about what our true motives are. But, there can be little doubt that the slick talking and very convincing Dick Cheney is exploiting the fear caused by 9/11 and the terrible reputation of Sadam Hussein, so that the U.S. can accomplish its geo/political and economic purposes in Iraq as well as in the rest of the Middle East.

For those who are still under the delusion that the only reason the Iraqi people are still suffering under the suffocating sanctions, is because of their keeping out the weapons inspectors, this is not true. In a slip of the tongue, former Secretary of State, Madeline Albright made it clear that there would be no sanction lifting until Saddam was gone. She made the mistake only once, as she was obviously warned not to publicly acknowledge this open secret again. However, only recently other officials have begun to acknowledge that the sanctions going is dependent on Saddam going and is not dependant on the weapons going.

Consequently, it is a painful but clear lesson from recent history, that when either the U.S. or Israel is blaming their own intelligence agencies, blaming the Palestinians or blaming Iraq or even blaming Saddam Hussein, they are often using a pretext to accomplish some goal which is far more selfish and sinister than what they are talking about in order to deflect away attention from their more sinister objective. What significantly clarifies the extremely perverse and sinister purposes of The Bush’s “Man of Peace, “ is this:

Ariel Sharon was well aware that the spiritual leader of Hamas, Sheikh Ahmid Yassin, very soon before the Gaza massacre, reached a breakthrough preliminary agreement with Hamas factions. These various factions had all agreed to stop all bombings and shootings against Israeli civilians if Sharon would withdraw from West Bank cities, stop demolishing houses and end assassinations.

Sharon’s Strategy Requires More and More Spilled Israeli Blood

By the timing, magnitude and viciousness of AmerIsrael’s unprovoked attack against mostly women and children in a crowded Gaza apartment complex on 7/23, Sharon shouted his political strategy to all who have ears to hear. He could not have made it more clear. His strategy is that he must be careful to sufficiently enrage Palestinians so that they will not stop taking bloody revenge against Israeli civilians. For if there are no Palestinians sufficiently enraged to continue bloody retaliations against Israelis, Sharon will lose the pretext he must have to continue to pursue his long range purpose of controlling more and more Palestinian land and reducing Palestinians to unimportant irrelevance. So his strategy must insure that enraged, disposed Palestinians not become complacent and discontinue seeking blood revenge against Israelis.

It is naïve to think that the targeted assassination of one Hamas leader, Salah Shehade, using a one ton missile against a civilian apartment complex, did not have more sinister political purposes behind it than the extrajudicial execution of only one man. Yes, it is very difficult for reasonable people to accept this unpleasant shocking reality. This frequent guest at the White House must insure that his brother and sister Israelis will continue to die violent deaths. In his twisted mind, many Israeli bloody deaths are a justified requirement so that Israel can move full speed ahead on building his vision of a democratic, racist, apartheid, showcase nation.

240 Families Left Homeless

To help us realize the extent which this possessed man went to insure that Palestinians will be enraged enough to continue to murder Israelis, we will review the inhumane statistics of the Gaza murders.

(Before looking at the numbers, we will clarify the fact that the Israelis cannot use as an excuse the numbers that the Americans killed in Afghanistan. Not to excuse the Americans, but the two situations were totally different.

The Americans were fighting in totally unfamiliar territory while Israeli intelligence knew every twist in every alley of the area where the Gaza apartment buildings were located. They also were totally aware of who went in and out of those buildings.)

The awful toll was 9 or 11 children killed, and 6 adults killed; over 140 mostly civilians wounded with many of those maimed; 240 families left homeless; 3 apartment buildings totally destroyed; 20 buildings around the apartment complex heavily damaged; untold and immeasurable mental anguish from all of the destruction of precious life and important property. All of this from one American F16 firing from close range one American one ton missile to murder one Palestinian man. Yet, “The Butcher” enthusiastically labeled this whole inhumane operation as a “great success” before his spin agency said the attack was a mistake. All of this occurred in the context of a sacred promise by the AmerIsraeli government that both the F16 and the missile would be used for only defensive purposes.

A relevant question is: How many U.S. Senators and Congressman and women vomited up their half digested dinners when they heard on CNN these brutal statistics and realized that they were the ones to empower Israel to commit this atrocity. For it was their personal votes for AmerIsrael which enabled AmerIsrael to carry out this atrocity against occupied Palestinian civilians under the guise of murdering one man who was known to his own people as a “Resistance Fighter.” Woe unto AmerIsrael and America!

Amazingly but not surprisingly, on August 21, two days short of one month after the heavy-handed air strike, Israel again changed its propaganda tune about the reason behind the inhumane strike against sleeping Palestinian women and children. Apparently realizing that their cover story of not knowing so many women and children were sleeping inside the civilian apartment complex made the Israeli spy machine look stupid, so the propaganda changed. The appropriate Israeli air force officer finally agreed to proclaim that the air strike was morally correct.

Israeli’s Air Force commander, Dan Holutz in an interview published in the Israeli Haaretz newspaper said that it was “militarily and morally” proper to drop a one ton bomb on Salah Shehada’s home in a crowded Gaza neighborhood despite the risk of injuring other civilians.

As the previous statistics I have listed clearly demonstrate, there was not just a risk of injuring other civilians. This man had the brazen audacity to make this truth distorting statement even after the realities were known by everyone that at least 14 other civilians were murdered in addition to the targeted man and at least 140 others were maimed and wounded, mostly women and children.

The compassionate and sensitive air force commander also told the newspaper that he was angered by the criticism of the attack. He said that “it was legitimate to strike a resistance leader even if innocent people were killed.”

It would be scary to know where this sensitive Major General draws the line on how many crowded civilian apartments he would destroy to execute one man. It would also be significant to know if he would feel the same way about the legitimacy of the slaughter of innocents, if his wife and children or mother and father were over night guests in those apartments.

It is a tragic reality that The Bush and too many American Christian leaders would have us believe that there exists a God who will bless the U.S. for our complicity in the cold blooded murdering of Palestinians and extending both their humiliation and their suffering. Of course, that would not be the precise way they would articulate their belief, but that is the way their belief works itself out. But there is not a sincere religion which claims that a God exists who would bless America for assisting Israel in this kind of inhumanity. But a God who will judge the U.S. and is judging the U.S. for our complicity in such horrendous crimes does exist and is observing. The God of Judgement is not only observing the crimes of the AmerIsraeli Killing Machine. He also observes the AmerIsraeli propaganda machine as it grinds out lies to whitewash there never to be forgotten crimes against human beings who He has created in His Own Image. Woe to AmerIsrael!

Negative Consequences or Positive Rewards

There is one more misleading statement by The Bush that is connected to his “Heavy Handed” pronouncement. His White House spokesperson, Ari Fleischer, added what was supposed to be an implied threat against Israel along with the President’s earlier heavy-handed comment. Mr. Fleischer added that the President has said:

“Israel has to be mindful of the consequences of it actions.”

There are two ways that this concise statement by the President can be understood. But both ways of understanding the statement turn out to be the U.S. rewarding Israel’s detestable war crimes and do not become punishments against Israel.

The first way to understand the term, “mindful of the consequences of its actions” seems to be a reference to the acts of revenge and retaliation that the enraged Palestinians will take against the outrageous Gaza attack by the Israelis. But that revenge is exactly what Israel wants so that it can be rewarded by the U.S. with more aid to use against the increased attacks of retaliation by the Palestinians. Also, the increased Palestinian attacks will give Israelis the pretext they need to increase their own facts on the ground in order to increase their territory and decrease Palestinian territory.

The second way to interpret the term “mindful of the consequences of its actions,” is the implication that the U.S. will actually punish Israel in some way for the “heavy handed” act of massacring women and children. But no matter how dramatic Ari Fleischer was in quoting George Bush’s possible words of warning, everyone with perception knows that it does not work that way. America does not punish Israel.

Every American president knows that you can’t receive enough Jewish votes to win the next election if you try to punish Israel. George W.’s father learned that the hard way when his attempt to put conditions on financial support of Israel probably cost him his re-election. So history tells us that instead of withholding financial aid from Israel for their merciless missile attack, Israel will receive increased aid to help them fight the inevitable retaliation. For as George W. likes to remind everyone, “Israel has the right to defend itself.” Then, when Israel commits a “heavy handed” act against Palestinians, each Israeli spin artist will jump up like a jack-in-the-box on the various network news programs and repeat over and over, “We have the right to fight terrorists just like the U.S. does.”

So, because of bloody Palestinian revenge and despite America’s very temporary displeasure with Israel’s war crimes, Israel will continue to receive the psychological rewards and the material rewards it so blatantly and openly manipulates from the U.S.

Will Ghandi and or Martin Luther King Jr. Help?

There is one realistic possibility which could stop this cycle of increased sympathy, psychological support and practical support for AmerIsrael while the main thing the Palestinians receive is blame. But this stopping of the bloody cycle is only a possibility if Palestinians leaders are willing and able to have all the various factions agree to suppress their justified rage and discontinue all attacks and violence against AmerIsrael. This putting aside all acts of revenge will be exceptionally difficult for all factions to agree on and to carry out. But, unless there is a broad based deep commitment to a similar strategy of Ghandi and Dr. King, the desperate and totally unethical Ariel Sharon will finally find a way to provoke Bloody Palestinian retaliations.

No matter how peaceful the vast majority of Palestinians may become, once Israel is able to provoke or even fake a bloody Palestinian retaliation, every evil act Israel has committed will be conveniently swept under the rug and the Palestinians will once again receive the vast majority of the blame for the return of violence. At the worst, America will only consider Israeli atrocities as “heavy handed.” In contrast, the Palestinians will again be stereotyped by the U.S. public and the U.S. administration as evil terrorists and the much more heavily armed Israelis will be considered the innocent victims. So the AmerIsraelis will be told once again to defend themselves against evil Palestinian terrorism with no mention of hideous Israeli terrorism.

Once again Israel will receive more psychological and practical support from the U.S. to destroy all resistance to their illegal and immoral occupation of the Palestinians. Thus, the U.S. will continue to enable Israel to create more facts on the ground. So on and on the destructive cycle will go. AmerIsrael will continue to gain and gain and the dispossessed Palestinians will continue to lose and lose.

The Evil Axis

We will now consider another of The Bush’s bizarre choice of words. On this occasion, however, it was more the target of his words than the actual choice of his words.

The media has reported that Condoleezza Rice, U.S. National Security Advisor, had a strong influence on The Bush’s infamous Axis of Evil speech. Personally, I have always had admiration for this respected presidential advisor’s sincerity, brilliance and declared religious values. Nevertheless, I am shocked and disillusioned with her consistent, heavy handed, simplistic denunciations of Palestinians. In contrast, her naïve, simplistic, one-sided support of AmerIsrael is equally distasteful and disturbing.

I have heard that there is considerable mutual admiration between this security advisor and the AmerIsraeli Prime Minister. If this is true, there may soon be potential for a joint portrait of The Bush, “Condi” Rice and the man known as the “Butcher.” Perhaps some internationally renowned artist would consider it a once in a lifetime privilege to paint such an important trio of powerful, influential world figures.

If such a portrait is ever painted, I predict the following will occur.

When those in the Arab world for the first time view on International CNN these three smiling, painted faces, their united response will be:

“Our eyes have now beheld the true “Axis of Evil!”

(Of course we can not be certain that there will not be some who will refer to them as the “Kernel of Evil” rather than the “Axis of Evil.”

Epilogue

I had truly intended that the term “Axis of Evil” would end this paper. But in the middle of the night after I thought I had completed my writing on The Bush, I reflected on how sad I feel when my conscience will not allow me to avoid writing such a negative paper. But, as an unimportant person, my words attempting to expose evil may only be read by very few. In contrast, the ill chosen and biased words, directives or decisions of a calloused and gullible U. S. President may have horrible repercussions and may negatively impact tens of millions. His confused attitudes may result in hundreds if not thousands or perhaps millions of deaths and wide spread suffering and mental anguish not just in Israel and the West Bank and Gaza, but throughout the Middle East.

On 9/22/02, an analysts being interviewed on MSNBC, Joe Madison, made an extremely disturbing but realistic observation. He explained how the U.S. attacking Iraq could quite probably lead to Iraq attacking Israel. This would then result in Israel retaliating against Iraq which would quite possibly draw in Arab nations against Israel which could not only ignite a conflagration in the Middle East, but could also ignite World War Three.

For obvious reasons, this reasonable consequence of U.S. pre-emptive action against Iraq is not something the U.S. Administration wants to have discussed openly. They are much more comfortable with the much less threatening words, “a time for a regime change in Iraq.” This narrow minded, self-serving, arrogant threat by the Bush may also guarantee an exceptionally low quality of life for both Palestinian Arabs and other Arabs who are not killed in a potential conflagration. Also, there will be multiple others who are negatively impacted by this myopic man’s hawkish directives and superficial decisions. In fact, this exaggeration of the threat which Iraq poses to the U.S. may also result in a much lower quality of life for Americans. Airlines may go bankrupt and there may be a number of negative impacts on the U.S. economy resulting in millions of lost jobs.

I also must express my shock and deep grief that deeply religious leaders such as Miss Rice, Mr. Bush and famous religious radio personalities exploit their considerable institutional authority and influence in order to demonize a suffering people. In contrast, to their harshness toward Palestinians, they proudly but naively find every conceivable excuse to enable and empower a want-to-be, reincarnated evil King Manasseh, to continue to lead his government in murderous, inhumane policies. As if empowering this driven man were not enough, as previously mentioned, the proclaimed leader of the free world announced that this unconvicted but documented murderer is a “man of peace.” For this horrible misjudgment, this President has earned the permanent disrespect and distrust of every Arab in the world as well as the contempt of millions of others. So, my resorting to some ridicule while exposing much painful reality is what my conscience dictates that I must do.

Though only ALLAH has the authority and knowledge to label a particular person as “evil,” virtually every choice I observe Mr. Ariel Sharon make, appears to be an exceptionally evil choice. So I hope to find out at the Judgement Seat of The Messiah how Miss Rice and Mr. Bush found him to be a man whose evil policies and actions they must publicly support and empower.

I have stated my own deep conviction that Sharon has an unstated but explicit strategy of evilly provoking enraged and dispossessed Palestinians to murder more and more of the sons and daughters of Israel in order to enable him to accomplish his nationalistic obsessions. But this brings me to a dreadful conclusion to which I previously alluded. Whether Sharon realizes it or not, he appears to be modeling the worst of his behaviors on the attitudes and actions of one of the most evil Kings of Israel’s history.

In second Chronicles 33:6 it is written about King Menasseh;

“He sacrificed his sons in the fire…”

In second Kings 22:22 it is also written about the same wicked king:

“Moreover, Manasseh also shed so much innocent blood that he filled Jerusalem from end to end…” (Of course this is a literary exaggeration, but the scriptures are emphasizing the extraordinary amount of blood to make certain that people get a vivid picture of the enormity of this man’s wickedness.)

It is not his own son and daughters which Ariel Sharon sacrifices, but he wickedly and willingly sacrifices other people’s sons and daughters. Still, it is Israeli sons and daughters being sacrificed in the fires randomly consuming Israel. But it is the precious blood of real flesh and blood Israelis, which permanently stains the streets of Jerusalem and the streets of other cities in Israel due to this man’s fanatic obsession. This is without mentioning the equally precious blood of Palestinians, which he is maliciously sacrificing in West Bank cities and Gaza as a direct result of evil Israeli actions, policies and attitudes.

Despite all of this spilling of mostly innocent blood, U.S. leaders remain in deep denial. The U.S. government continues to enable this to occur before the eyes of the world even though history is shouting at us that another partially deranged leader only last century filled gas chambers and furnaces with Jewish sons and daughters. Concerning those unimaginable atrocities occurring in a supposedly civilized world in a predominantly “Christian” nation, people throughout all of the nations unitedly agreed!

“Never Again!”

What is often skipped over when reflecting on Hitler’s crime is how he influenced so many men who were well educated and considered to be men of principle, to support and enable him. Similarly, in Israel today, Sharon does not carry out his evil by himself. Regretfully, similar to Adolph Hitler, he appears to have a demented charisma about him, which causes respected family men who speak softly and who wear white shirts and neckties, to climb on to his evil bandwagon.

Thankfully, the horrible statistics in the West Bank and Gaza are now much less shocking than in Hitler’s Germany. Nevertheless the “Butcher’s” evil motives are no less sinister. Also, the lower statistics have no relevance to either the hearts or the minds of the loved ones of the slain victims.

Understandably, the American conditioned mindset had great difficulty accepting the reality that a respected guest at the esteemed White House can actually be an Israeli leader with deranged motives. (This contradictory phenomenon of an unwillingness to see current Israeli leaders as capable of excessive evil, continues to occur even though the Old Testament Prophets had no reluctance to recognize that some of Israel and Judah’s esteemed leaders were consistently “doing evil in the eyes of the Lord.”)

Tragically, Israel’s continuous shedding of what is often considered by Americans as the less valuable blood of Palestinians, has not eliminated the gross immorality of much of U.S. policy. So America continues to offer unquestioning support to Sharon’s immoral AmerIsrael. Perhaps insight into this obsessed man’s strategy of making certain more and more Israeli blood is shed will finally pierce the pro Israel, American conscience.

Hopefully, Americans may soon come to finally realize that it is not the alleged ineptitude or supposed inherent evil in any Palestinians leader or leaders or evil Palestinian faction which is the root cause of both Israeli and Palestinian blood continuing to flow like a river. Rather, many may soon acknowledge that the majority of responsibility and the ultimate responsibility for the continuous flow of mostly innocent blood from both of these bleeding people is with AmerIsrael. (Tragically if someone like the treacherous Netanyahu would replace “The Butcher,” even bloodier and more inhumane policies may result.)

Though illegal and inhumane occupation, the withholding of rightful revenue, extrajudicial executions, demolishing of homes, expansion of illegal settlements, disenfranchisement, consistent humiliation and both planned and random murders, may all appear to be the root causes of the blood shed, covert commitment to an evil and sinister strategy of blood letting by Israel now appears to have both exacerbated the bloodshed and has made it even more of a certainty.

This strategy will continue and be effective even though destroying the homes of the families of the suicide bombers will discourage some of the potential bombers from their murderous acts. This evil Israeli strategy will also be successful despite building walls, the expulsion of family members of suicide bombers from the West Bank and taking other measures to prevent the shedding of innocent Israeli blood. Even though many such measures are in place, there is one inevitable reality. Certain powerful and hungry hawks in Israel’s political, military, religious and intelligence establishments will discover evil ways to insure that desperate and enraged Palestinians are deliberately provoked to shed more and more innocent Israeli blood to make certain the bloody cycle prevents peace.

It must be acknowledged that there are Palestinian extremists who are committed to acts of terror and violence in order to obstruct any peace process. However, there is a strong probability that these obstructionists will be marginalized when Israel changes its brutal policies and discontinues its immoral and illegal occupation and withdraws from all illegal settlements.

(Though it may seem crude and simplistic to draw attention to the following reality, the oppressed Palestinians are very limited in the ways they can retaliate against the acts of their Israeli oppressors. Consequently, Palestinians are forced by circumstances to mainly resort to blood revenge. In contrast, their oppressors have a multitude of ways to be cruel to them. Nevertheless, the Israelis still shed far more blood than the Palestinians do. But they also, skillfully and cruelly use a variety of other ways to inflict intense physical and psychological pain and suffering on their vulnerable victims.)

Not all of those who are committed to the sick strategy of making certain that more and more Israeli blood must be spilled, consciously realize that their strategy is built upon the foundation of a continuous flow of the blood of innocent Israeli women and children. Yet, their lack of insight into the perversity of their own government’s strategy does not relieve their guilt. Whether or not the most sick Israeli leaders have explicitly calculated the specific size of the river of Israeli blood required for them to achieve their political purposes, they are committed to a shrewd, calloused and cruel Machiavellian leadership which will continue to attack, crush, occupy, humiliate, starve, disenfranchise, imprison, murder and maim, more and more Palestinians. Yet, Ariel Sharon is so psychologically convinced that his cause is righteous that he may be able to pass a lie detector test proving that he does not want any Israeli blood to be shed. But his policies reveal that he is lying to himself.

All of this cruelty and murder of Palestinians in their warped minds is necessary to guarantee that more and more Israelis are murdered in retaliation, so that there is a pretext for Israel to murder and commit other cruelty against more and more Palestinians, so that Palestinians will retaliate and murder more and more Israelis so the Israelis will have a pretext to murder and commit other cruelty against more and more Palestinians so the Palestinians will retaliate and murder…

Though certain Israeli leaders are committed to sufficient Israeli blood being shed to make certain the bloody cycle continues, Israeli officials will do whatever possible to limit the number of Israeli deaths as long as their preventive measures do not stop the deadly cycle and make peace a realistic possibility. So there will still be much rejoicing in Israel when they can make arrests of those responsible for suicide bombings and other destruction. But the continuation of the bloody cycle remains sacred to certain rabid nationalists and Zionists. Yet, there may soon come a time when wiser minds will prevail and Israel will decide that the intentional strategy of sacrificing Israeli blood has out lived its usefulness. Then, a new less bloody strategy will be found to replace it.

In this evil Israeli depraved mindset which is currently driving Israeli policy, the streets of Jerusalem and other Israeli, Gaza and West Bank streets must be soaked with blood as the only sure way for AmerIsrael to avoid peace and at the same time insure U.S. support of their expansionist strategy and goals. As the one American journalist succinctly wrote: “They must fend off the threat of peace.” So current sick Israeli leaders are willing to sacrifice streams of their own children’s blood so it will guarantee that Israel will grow and grow while Palestine and Palestinians will go and go.

But, does not the United States have the authority and the leverage to stop this bloody cycle? Since American tax payers are underwriting bloody Israeli policies with billions of U.S. dollars and to a small extent, are financially supporting Palestinians, does it not make sense that our nation could order and if necessary, coerce both sides to participate in serious peace negotiations?

Of course, a disadvantage to this logical act would be a significant loss of Jewish votes for the President. Another obstacle would be the strong pro Israel bias of George W. Bush as well as the same pro Israel bias by the huge flock of hungry, screeching hawks circling around him. Regretfully, the strongest obstacle to insisting on fair and just negotiations is probably the Presidents own confused theology which causes him to think he is personally turning his back on the Will of God if he does anything which will detract Israel from achieving everything they want or think that God wants them to have. Thus, his Zionist mind set is a mighty contributing force to keeping the bloody cycle perpetuating itself because it guarantees Israeli expansion and must not be underestimated regarding the evil his Zionist mind set will achieve.

It seems that the President protects his somewhat sensitive conscience (sensitive regarding Americans and calloused regarding Arabs) by publicly declaring that he supports a Palestinian state but by simultaneously forcing unachievable conditions on Palestinian leaders such as achieving democracy before there can be a state. This way, The Bush forces these leaders to be complaint with AmerIsraeli needs so that they will be forced to betray their own people in order to earn the right to negotiate for their own state. Then, once again The Bush will self-righteously point to the failure of the Palestinians to meet reasonable conditions so he will accuse them of refusing to take what he and Israel so generously offer to them.

Why does “The Butcher” Remain Prime Minister?

As a final testimony to the heavy handedness of The Bush in castigating the Palestinians while cheering for the Israelis, consider how he has not once hinted that the “Blood Soaked Butcher” should be replaced as Prime Minister of Israel. This is so even though hundreds of respected American Jews are making public statements about how, “Bush likes to defend the war criminal Ariel Sharon, but that any wise friend of Israel would abhor.” (Regretfully, very few have accused The Bush of being wise.) The co-author of an Open Letter from American Jews’ in the July 17, 2002 New York Times perceptively pointed out that:

“The bloody path of vengeance and expansion currently pursued by the Israeli government can return only an army of suicide bombers.”

The Bush is virtually demanding the removal of the elected head of the Palestinian Authority. Then why is this supposedly unbiased leader not making a parallel demand for the removal of the alleged documented murderer who heads Israel? There must be a reasonable explanation.

Could it be his massive naivete?

Or, could it be The Bush’s massive need for remaining in a state of psychological denial regarding the perverse strategy of Ariel Sharon?

Or, could it be his massive confusion which allows him to think that a just Israeli nation can be built by mixing its foundation with the spilled blood of innocent Palestinian and Israeli women and children?

Or, could it be his massive need to avoid offending Jewish voters and other Israel supporters, remembering his father’s costly political mistake?

Or is it one massive mixture of all of the above plus other confused thinking which is unworthy of even a dry, unattractive desert Bush? How much more then, is his muddled, biased thinking unworthy of a Bush who is pretending to be both a President and self appointed leader of the entire world?

“Oh Wise ALLAH! Please protect Your oil from the greedy chains of Cheney.”

“Oh Merciful ALLAH! Please rescue both Palestinian and Israeli women and children from the blood covered knife of the Israeli Butcher.”

“Oh ALMIGHTY ALLAH! Please rescue us all from the deadly poisonous thorns of the lethal Bush.”